2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4967572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the inverse Magnus effect for flow past a rotating cylinder

Abstract: Citation: B John et al. "On the inverse Magnus effect for flow past a rotatingAbstract. Flow past a rotating cylinder has been investigated using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. The study focuses on the occurrence of the inverse Magnus effect under subsonic flow conditions. In particular, the variations in the coefficients of lift and drag have been investigated as a function of the Knudsen and Reynolds numbers. Additionally, a temperature sensitivity study has been carried out to assess the influenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is similar with the rotating cylindrical body moving in viscous fluid. In fluid mechanics, a rotating cylindrical body moving in viscous fluid is subjected to the resistance, and the direction of resistance is consistent with the fluid flow direction [15, 16]. Thus, the material on the interface between shoulder and workpiece is subjected to resistance (N) parallel to the material flow direction and contrary to the welding direction, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Incomplete Contact Region Due To Tool Tiltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is similar with the rotating cylindrical body moving in viscous fluid. In fluid mechanics, a rotating cylindrical body moving in viscous fluid is subjected to the resistance, and the direction of resistance is consistent with the fluid flow direction [15, 16]. Thus, the material on the interface between shoulder and workpiece is subjected to resistance (N) parallel to the material flow direction and contrary to the welding direction, as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Incomplete Contact Region Due To Tool Tiltmentioning
confidence: 99%