2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1846396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship in a Real Option Model with Stochastic Volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous researchers have realized the deficiency of the constant volatility assumption. For example, in addition to determining 22% as a suitable annualized volatility value, Smit performs a calculation with annualized volatility values of 15% and 30% as a reference [7]. However, Smit's method is problematic when used in practice because it is very difficult for a mining company to predict the future value of the volatility of the price of mineral products.…”
Section: Convenience Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous researchers have realized the deficiency of the constant volatility assumption. For example, in addition to determining 22% as a suitable annualized volatility value, Smit performs a calculation with annualized volatility values of 15% and 30% as a reference [7]. However, Smit's method is problematic when used in practice because it is very difficult for a mining company to predict the future value of the volatility of the price of mineral products.…”
Section: Convenience Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers believe that the use of constant volatility will result in overestimation or underestimation of the price of a mining concession because volatility can experience relatively significant variations from year to year. Therefore, it is more reasonable to assume that the volatility is stochastic (e.g., Ting et al [7] and Huang et al [8]). However, models based on this assumption are relatively complex and therefore have rarely been used in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current transaction cost problem can be characterized as a free-boundary problem. The fast mean-reversion asymptotics for the finite horizon free boundary problem arising from American options pricing was developed in Fouque et al [2001], and recently there has been interest in similar analysis for perpetual (infinitely-lived) American options (used as part of a real options model) in Ting et al [2013], and for a structural credit risk model in McQuade [2013]. Here, we also have an infinite horizon free-boundary problem, but it is, in addition, an eigenvalue problem.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%