2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8693(03)00388-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the irreducibility of commuting varieties of nilpotent matrices

Abstract: Given an n × n nilpotent matrix over an algebraically closed field K, we prove some properties of the set of all the n × n nilpotent matrices over K which commute with it. Then we give a proof of the irreducibility of the variety of all the pairs (A, B) of n × n nilpotent matrices over K such that [A, B] = 0 if either char K = 0 or char K ≥ n 2. We get as a consequence a proof of the irreducibility of the local Hilbert scheme of n points of a smooth algebraic surface over K if either char K = 0 or char K ≥ n 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
76
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This corollary generalises earlier results by Briançon [6] for p = 0, Iarrobino [14] for p > n, and Basili [1] for p ≥ n/2. In conjunction with an observation in [22, (1.2)] it also shows that H r is isomorphic (as a reduced scheme) to the closure in Gr r (A) of the (r − 1)-dimensional family of principal ideals J = A x − (t 1 y + t 2 y 2 + · · · + t r−1 y r−1 ) | (t 1 , t 2 , .…”
Section: Proof It Follows From [16 Sect 5] and [29 Sect 2] Thatsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This corollary generalises earlier results by Briançon [6] for p = 0, Iarrobino [14] for p > n, and Basili [1] for p ≥ n/2. In conjunction with an observation in [22, (1.2)] it also shows that H r is isomorphic (as a reduced scheme) to the closure in Gr r (A) of the (r − 1)-dimensional family of principal ideals J = A x − (t 1 y + t 2 y 2 + · · · + t r−1 y r−1 ) | (t 1 , t 2 , .…”
Section: Proof It Follows From [16 Sect 5] and [29 Sect 2] Thatsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was Guralnick [7] who showed that this is no longer the case for the variety of triples of commuting matrices (see also Guralnick and Sethuraman [8], Holbrook and Omladič [11], Omladič [14], Han [10],Šivic [16]). Recently, it was proved that the variety of commuting pairs of nilpotent matrices was irreducible (Baranovsky [1], Basili [2]). Our motivation to study the problem is to contribute to better understanding of the structure of this variety and which might also help in understanding the (ir)reducibility of the variety of triples of commuting matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vue queJ (3,2) (E) s'applique birationnellement sur J (3,2) (E), on obtient la classe de ceci comme l'image directe de la classe de la première. Or, la classe deJ (3,2) (E) est connue au moins après restriction à l'ouvert Z \ W ; donc on la connaît même dans Z, parce qu'on a dim W < dimJ (3,2) …”
Section: Nous Avons π(Junclassified
“…Or, la classe deJ (3,2) (E) est connue au moins après restriction à l'ouvert Z \ W ; donc on la connaît même dans Z, parce qu'on a dim W < dimJ (3,2) …”
Section: Nous Avons π(Junclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation