2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/912/1/012010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the iterative solution of the gap equation in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model

Abstract: Abstract. In this work we revise the standard iterative procedure to find the solution of the gap equation in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model within the most popular regularization schemes available in literature in the super-strong coupling regime. We observe that whereas for the hard cut-off regularization schemes, the procedure smoothly converges to the physically relevant solution, Pauli-Villars and Proper-Time regularization schemes become chaotic in the sense of discrete dynamical systems. We call for the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were generalized by some of us in Ref. [36] for different regularization schemes. In that work, we observed, not surprisingly, that for the three-dimensional (3D) and fourdimensional (4D) hard momentum cut-off regularization schemes, the procedure converges to the dynamical mass in a finite number of iterations and this solution continues to be an attractor even in the super-strong coupling regime.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…These findings were generalized by some of us in Ref. [36] for different regularization schemes. In that work, we observed, not surprisingly, that for the three-dimensional (3D) and fourdimensional (4D) hard momentum cut-off regularization schemes, the procedure converges to the dynamical mass in a finite number of iterations and this solution continues to be an attractor even in the super-strong coupling regime.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…This means the non-trivial and non-negative solution of the gap equation can be found through this procedure and is unique. The first example of the iterative procedure failing to converge is shown in Figure 5, corresponding to Equation (12). The first feature that pops to the eye is the non-converging region of the Figure 5, similar to the one found in the logistic map [13] .…”
Section: Results: Gap Equation In Vacuummentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 5. Plot of the iterative procedure to solve the gap equation using Equation (12). As we observed before, if the coupling strength exceeds G c = 1, chiral symmetry is broken.…”
Section: Results: Gap Equation In Vacuummentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations