2016
DOI: 10.1137/140989856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Jump Conditions for an Immersed Interface Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different approach consists in considering unfitted meshes, where the fluid mesh is fixed on the background while the structure one is free to move independently. Within these methods, the immersed boundary (IB) [34,35,5,31,6,23,25,4] and the fictitious domain (FD) methods [25,22] are two effective techniques that were successfully employed in the case of thin valve leaflets; see, e.g., [43,14,36,3,8,24]. A more recent methodology is based on an unfitted formulation that allows one to treat nonconforming, overlapping/unfitted meshes by writing the weak formulation of fluid and structure problems in their physical domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach consists in considering unfitted meshes, where the fluid mesh is fixed on the background while the structure one is free to move independently. Within these methods, the immersed boundary (IB) [34,35,5,31,6,23,25,4] and the fictitious domain (FD) methods [25,22] are two effective techniques that were successfully employed in the case of thin valve leaflets; see, e.g., [43,14,36,3,8,24]. A more recent methodology is based on an unfitted formulation that allows one to treat nonconforming, overlapping/unfitted meshes by writing the weak formulation of fluid and structure problems in their physical domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%