2007
DOI: 10.1134/s0012266107030111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the justification of the Galerkin method for hyperbolic equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is common to use for proving existence of exact weak solutions to hyperbolic equations; however, from the view point of justification of the Galerkin method as a constructive tool for approximate solution, the most interesting issue is the proof of strong convergence of approximate solutions to the exact solution and the search of estimates for the convergence rate. Some energy estimates for the convergence rate of the Mikhlin form of the Galerkin method for second-order abstract hyperbolic equations just under the assumption of existence of an exact weak solution were obtained in [6] (for linear equations) and in [7,8] (for quasilinear equations of a less general form than (0.1)). The commonest version of the Galerkin method is the finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is common to use for proving existence of exact weak solutions to hyperbolic equations; however, from the view point of justification of the Galerkin method as a constructive tool for approximate solution, the most interesting issue is the proof of strong convergence of approximate solutions to the exact solution and the search of estimates for the convergence rate. Some energy estimates for the convergence rate of the Mikhlin form of the Galerkin method for second-order abstract hyperbolic equations just under the assumption of existence of an exact weak solution were obtained in [6] (for linear equations) and in [7,8] (for quasilinear equations of a less general form than (0.1)). The commonest version of the Galerkin method is the finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.1) A similar estimate in the case of a linear initial problem and the purely implicit computation scheme (in time) was obtained in [3]. Unlike [3] here we do not require that the operators A(t) and A 0 form an acute angle for the validity of (3.1).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Unlike [3] here we do not require that the operators A(t) and A 0 form an acute angle for the validity of (3.1).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations