1983
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/16/18/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the K absorption edge investigations of copper in some complexes involving ON and SN donor ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth comparing the present values for the shift of the principal absorption maxima with the values reported by earlier workers for other copper(II) complexes. 9,10 The values for the present copper(II) complexes lie in the range 17.3-22.9 eV compared with earlier values 9,10 in the range 17.7-25.4 eV. Hence on the basis of this comparison, we may say that all the samples in the present investigation possess an oxidation state of C2.…”
Section: Shift Of the Principal Absorption Maximumsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is worth comparing the present values for the shift of the principal absorption maxima with the values reported by earlier workers for other copper(II) complexes. 9,10 The values for the present copper(II) complexes lie in the range 17.3-22.9 eV compared with earlier values 9,10 in the range 17.7-25.4 eV. Hence on the basis of this comparison, we may say that all the samples in the present investigation possess an oxidation state of C2.…”
Section: Shift Of the Principal Absorption Maximumsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The intense rising K-edge feature near 8987 eV for all three complexes is similar to that of solid [Cu(tsc) 2 Cl 2 ] (8987.08 eV), 66 which is associated with either highly covalent Cu(II)−S bonding or with multiple-scattering associated with squareplanar systems. 67 The intense rising edge feature near 8987 eV of [Cu(tsc) 2 ](NO 3 ) 2 is more intense than that of [Cu(tsc) 2 SO 4 ], consistent with its overall square-planar structure.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%