1951
DOI: 10.5575/geosoc.57.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On "The Kurotaki Unconformity"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Boso forearc basin is divided in the Miocene to Pleistocene Miura Group and Kazusa Group. The boundary between the two groups is the Kurotaki Unconformity, 13) a large-scale geological boundary distributed from east to west. The Kazusa Group comprises alternation of sand and mud without hydrothermal metamorphism and includes many volcanic tuff layers.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Boso forearc basin is divided in the Miocene to Pleistocene Miura Group and Kazusa Group. The boundary between the two groups is the Kurotaki Unconformity, 13) a large-scale geological boundary distributed from east to west. The Kazusa Group comprises alternation of sand and mud without hydrothermal metamorphism and includes many volcanic tuff layers.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the Boso Peninsula, the unconformity between the Kazusa and Miura groups is distinctly angular, representing a temporal gap from ca. 3 to 2.4 Ma (Kameo and Sekine, 2013), but on the Miura Peninsula there is no signi cant angular relationship between the two groups (Koike, 1951;Akamine et al, 1956). No signi cant temporal gap corresponding to the Kurotaki unconformity has been identi ed in the Inubo Group, exposed on the Choshi Peninsula, based on biostratigraphy and tephrostratigraphy (Sakai, 1990;Tamura et al, 2014).…”
Section: Forearc Basin Lls: the Miura And Kazusa Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary between the Miura and Kazusa Groups is marked by the Kurotaki Unconformity (Koike, 1951), which represents a depositional hiatus and submarine erosion at~3 Ma when the convergence direction of the Philippine Sea Plate changed (M. Takahashi, 2006). Lithostratigraphy differs between the eastern and western Boso Peninsula (Figure 2 Kamiya et al (2017).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientations of structures (e.g. bedding and faults) differ between the Kazusa and Miura Groups (Koike, 1951), and the stratigraphy differs between the eastern and western parts of the basin. The Miura Group has been substantially eroded in the eastern part, with the uppermost part of the group being absent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%