2020
DOI: 10.4310/ajm.2020.v24.n3.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the $\Lambda$-cotorsion subgroup of the Selmer group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where T f is the Tate module of an elliptic curve E{Q with good supersingular reduction at p, a similar result has been proved in [16]. One of the key ingredients of the proof given in [16] is a link between the the fine Selmer group of E over Q cyc and the maximal Λ-torsion submodule of the Pontryagin dual of the p-primary Selmer group of E over Q cyc , which was proved by Wingberg [31] (see also [20], where an alternative proof is given). In the present paper, we prove Theorem 4.4 by first establishing analogues of Wingberg's result in the context of modular forms (see Theorems 3.1 and 3.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case where T f is the Tate module of an elliptic curve E{Q with good supersingular reduction at p, a similar result has been proved in [16]. One of the key ingredients of the proof given in [16] is a link between the the fine Selmer group of E over Q cyc and the maximal Λ-torsion submodule of the Pontryagin dual of the p-primary Selmer group of E over Q cyc , which was proved by Wingberg [31] (see also [20], where an alternative proof is given). In the present paper, we prove Theorem 4.4 by first establishing analogues of Wingberg's result in the context of modular forms (see Theorems 3.1 and 3.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the present paper, the latter definition is used. Our proof is very different from the ones employed in both [31] and [20]. We make use of Nekovář's spectral sequence, which seems to give a somewhat simpler and more general proof than the previous proofs available in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case where is the Tate module of an elliptic curve with good supersingular reduction at p , a similar result has been proved in [18]. One of the key ingredients of the proof given in [18] is a link between the fine Selmer group of E over and the maximal -torsion submodule of the Pontryagin dual of the p -primary Selmer group of E over that was proved by Wingberg [28] (see also Matar [19], where an alternative proof is given). In the present paper, we prove Theorem 4.4 by first establishing analogues of Wingberg’s result in the context of modular forms (see Theorems 3.1 and 3.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Remark 4.6. In [Mat19], Ahmed Matar gives a Galois theoretic proof of Wingberg's result (Theorem 4.3) with a slightly different hypothesis. See Theorem 1.1 of [Mat19].…”
Section: Conjecture a And µ-Invariant Of Torsion Part Of Dual Selmer ...mentioning
confidence: 99%