2013
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.696664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the laws of attraction at cocktail parties: Babble noise influences the production of number agreement

Abstract: Theoretical accounts of the language production process have claimed that grammatical encoding steps during the formulation stage happen in a largely automatic fashion, unimpeded by other cognitive processes (cf. Meyer, Wheeldon, & Krott, 2007: x). By eliciting agreement attraction errors, our study tested the effect of external distractor noise on the generation of subject-verb agreement in spoken language. We modelled noisy environments with three different speech-free sounds with spectral, or both spectral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier work, the attraction asymmetry has often been accounted for by reference to the concept of markedness (e.g., Eberhard, 1997 ; Eberhard et al, 2005 ): singular nouns are unmarked, whereas plural nouns are marked, thus, only features from the latter can interfere with computing the inflection of the verb. Given that we found an attraction effect with singular local nouns, our data suggest that the effect of markedness on the generation of agreement may be graded rather than categorical, with marked plural local nouns exerting a stronger effect on the choice of the verb form than unmarked singular local nouns (for similar conclusions, see Haskell et al, 2010 ; Hanke et al, 2013 ). The attraction asymmetry thus continues to serve as an important testing ground for theories about the processes and representations underlying agreement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In earlier work, the attraction asymmetry has often been accounted for by reference to the concept of markedness (e.g., Eberhard, 1997 ; Eberhard et al, 2005 ): singular nouns are unmarked, whereas plural nouns are marked, thus, only features from the latter can interfere with computing the inflection of the verb. Given that we found an attraction effect with singular local nouns, our data suggest that the effect of markedness on the generation of agreement may be graded rather than categorical, with marked plural local nouns exerting a stronger effect on the choice of the verb form than unmarked singular local nouns (for similar conclusions, see Haskell et al, 2010 ; Hanke et al, 2013 ). The attraction asymmetry thus continues to serve as an important testing ground for theories about the processes and representations underlying agreement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Despite the prevalence of background noise in everyday language contexts, research examining the effect of noise on speech production has been dominated by studies of acoustic-related changes in production. Very little work has investigated how noise affects higher-level properties of language such as syntax (but see Hanke, 2014 ; Harmon et al, 2021 ; Kemper et al, 2003 ). Moreover, moving beyond the descriptive level, we have lacked a satisfying account of why higher-level changes might be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%