1937
DOI: 10.2307/3272243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Life Cycle of Contracaecum spiculigerum (Rud.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas Thomas (1937a) observed two larval moults inside the egg shell of this parasite and considered the hatched larvae to be at the third stage, Mozgovoy et al (1965Mozgovoy et al ( , 1968, Huizinga (1966) and Bartlett (1996) observed only one moult within the egg and took the hatched larvae for the secondstage larvae. The data by Thomas (1937a) concerning the two moults of larvae in the egg of C. rudolphii has recently been confirmed by Dziekońska-Rynko and Rokicki (2007), as well as by the results of the present paper. This pattern of moulting is also found in other anisakid nematodes, such as Contracaecum osculatum (Rudolphi, 1802), Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802), Anisakis simplex (Rudolphi, 1809) or Pseudoterranova decipiens (Krabbe, 1878) (see , Køie and Fagerholm 1993, 1995, Adroher et al 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas Thomas (1937a) observed two larval moults inside the egg shell of this parasite and considered the hatched larvae to be at the third stage, Mozgovoy et al (1965Mozgovoy et al ( , 1968, Huizinga (1966) and Bartlett (1996) observed only one moult within the egg and took the hatched larvae for the secondstage larvae. The data by Thomas (1937a) concerning the two moults of larvae in the egg of C. rudolphii has recently been confirmed by Dziekońska-Rynko and Rokicki (2007), as well as by the results of the present paper. This pattern of moulting is also found in other anisakid nematodes, such as Contracaecum osculatum (Rudolphi, 1802), Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802), Anisakis simplex (Rudolphi, 1809) or Pseudoterranova decipiens (Krabbe, 1878) (see , Køie and Fagerholm 1993, 1995, Adroher et al 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While Huizinga (1966) considered copepods to be transport (= paratenic) hosts, Bartlett (1996) designated them as "precursor hosts", emphasizing their possible role as a source of infection for amphipods. Our study clearly shows, as previously indicated by Thomas (1937a), Huizinga (1966) and Bartlett (1996), that copepods are not obligatory for the development of C. rudolphii and, therefore, serve only as paratenic hosts (see also Dziekońska-Rynko and Rokicki 2004); because the larvae increase in size in copepods, the latter may be designated metaparatenic hosts (Odening 1976). Mozgovoy et al (1965Mozgovoy et al ( , 1968 successfully infected predatory nymphs of aquatic insects (Odonata) with C. rudolphii third-stage larvae by feeding them experimentally infected copepods; because later they used these infected dragonflies for successful experimental infection of two young cormorants, these insects were considered to be the second intermediate hosts, as also the fish fry previously infected via infected copepods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations