2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the limitations of Volumetric Energy Density as a design parameter for Selective Laser Melting

Abstract: Energy density is often used as a metric to compare components manufactured with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) under different sets of deposition parameters (e.g., laser power, scan speed, layer thickness, etc.). We present a brief review of the current literature on additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel (SS) related to input parameter scaling relations. From previously published work we identified a range of Volumetric Energy Density (VED) values that should lead to deposition of fully dense parts. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
113
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 574 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
113
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10). Considering the same approach than (Hann et al, 2011), already used by Scipioni Bertoli et al (2017). for SLM, we also tried to correlate normalized bead penetrations (e/D) for both materials with a normalized enthalpy value ΔH/h s incorporating the thermo-physical properties of irradiated materials (diffusivity α).…”
Section: Analysis Of Melt-pool Shapes and Affected Depthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10). Considering the same approach than (Hann et al, 2011), already used by Scipioni Bertoli et al (2017). for SLM, we also tried to correlate normalized bead penetrations (e/D) for both materials with a normalized enthalpy value ΔH/h s incorporating the thermo-physical properties of irradiated materials (diffusivity α).…”
Section: Analysis Of Melt-pool Shapes and Affected Depthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However Scipioni Bertoli et al (2017) mentioned that such a parameter is not fully sufficient to predict the stable SLM regimes, due to the complex physics involved either at low VED or at high VED values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it appears that this convenient approach via the characterization with a single number is not able to sufficiently express the entire complexity of powder-bed based AM processes, like SLM [10][11][12]. Thus, at this stage, a proper description of the manufacturing process still requires the listing of the individual irradiation parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other less common in situ process optimization methods such as on-line process monitoring and in-line quality control have also been investigated, but are challenging to implement reliably into existing machine technologies [1214]. The use of volumetric heat-source energy density to optimize printing parameters has also been investigated, but has been shown to lack necessary information about the thermal phenomena that occurs during the process, and can be too generalized to apply to many different material systems [15]. In general, these techniques require significant setup time and materials which quickly increase production costs and are largely non-transferable among material systems and machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%