2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-001-0085-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the limits of anisochrony in pulse attribution

Abstract: Pulse is the subjective experience of isochrony, which is typically elicited by series of sensory events with close to isochronous spacing, as is common in music and poetry. We measured the amount of anisochrony in a 10-event sequence with 570- to 630-ms nominal inter-onset intervals (IOI) that corresponded to the threshold for pulse attribution. This threshold was 8.6% of the IOI across 28 participants with a wide range of musical training, as compared with 3.5% for detection of anisochrony in the same kind o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beat could easily be detected in the target sequence initially as it was perfectly regular (isochronous). The reference sequence was highly irregular as each time interval was shortened or lengthened at random by 30% on average, making the underlying regular beat imperceptible (19). The mean irregularity in the target, starting at 0% initially, was adaptively increased in steps of 4% and 2.5% until the underlying beat could not be detected and the target could not be reliably discriminated against the reference anymore.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The beat could easily be detected in the target sequence initially as it was perfectly regular (isochronous). The reference sequence was highly irregular as each time interval was shortened or lengthened at random by 30% on average, making the underlying regular beat imperceptible (19). The mean irregularity in the target, starting at 0% initially, was adaptively increased in steps of 4% and 2.5% until the underlying beat could not be detected and the target could not be reliably discriminated against the reference anymore.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A and B). Three relative timing tasks tested the beat-based analysis of rhythmic sequences, including the detection of the presence of a roughly regular beat (19), a deviation from an isochronous beat (20) and a distortion of a rhythmic pattern with a metrical beat (21) (Fig. 1 C-E).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the just-noticeable difference of changing tempo in a rich aural environment like the one presented by Bunin is difficult, but scholars have suggested a range of values for the just-noticeable difference between five and nine percent. (12) Of these studies, I believe the Madison and Merker (2002) finding of 8.6% represents the most ecologically valid. When reducing durational contours with Morris's contour-reduction algorithm, elements that differ by less than five percent should first be pruned in order to reflect this limitation of our perception.…”
Section: Curved Durational Contours As An Assessment Of Hierarchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Chopin's mazurkas typically exhibit a very standard rhythmic and metrical framework and commonly use repeated melodic patterns, especially in the left hand, which are an important cue to meter (Steedman, 1977;Temperley & Bartlette, 2002). In that sense, the eccentric renditions selected by Ohriner provide an interesting test of Temperley's hypothesis: how much rubato can performers apply before listeners are unable to synchronize or to feel a sense of pulse (Madison & Merker, 2002), in a repertoire characterized by a transparent metrical structure?…”
Section: Rubato and The Communicative Pressure Principlementioning
confidence: 99%