2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50657-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the limits of Reactive-Spark-Plasma Sintering to prepare magnetically enhanced nanostructured ceramics: the case of the CoFe2O4-NiO system

Abstract: Magnetic materials are crucial for the efficiency of the conversion-storage-transport-reconversion energy chain, and the enhancement of their performance has an important impact on technological development. The present work explores the possibility of preparing hetero-nano-structured ceramics based on magnetic oxides, by coupling a ferrimagnetic phase (F) with an antiferromagnetic one (AF) on the nanometric scale. The field-assisted sintering technique or SPS (Spark-Plasma Sintering), adopted at this purpose,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra are consistent with the signature of two main contributions, a sextet (major) and a doublet (minor) with an average isomer shift < δ > of 0.40 mm.s −1 and an average hyperfine field (<B hyp > of 49.0 T) (see Figure SI-4 in the supporting information section). The sextet is quite consistent with ferric cations involved in the ferrimagnetic spinel structure but some of them with a partial electron delocalization (explaining the inner wing of the left outer line), while the quadrupolar doublet must be assigned to paramagnetic ferrous species: they result probably from a small contamination by a paramagnetic phase non detected by XRD, such as siderite FeCO 3 (that would be compatible with the observation of traces of carbon as often reported on SPS sintered ceramics 44,45 ) and/or the replacement of the CoO phase by its solid solution Co 1-x Fe x O (x close to zero) (that would be compatible with the diffusion of iron cation from spinel to adjacent rock-salt grains because an interatomic diffusion in SPS sintered nanocomposites was also reported 34 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spectra are consistent with the signature of two main contributions, a sextet (major) and a doublet (minor) with an average isomer shift < δ > of 0.40 mm.s −1 and an average hyperfine field (<B hyp > of 49.0 T) (see Figure SI-4 in the supporting information section). The sextet is quite consistent with ferric cations involved in the ferrimagnetic spinel structure but some of them with a partial electron delocalization (explaining the inner wing of the left outer line), while the quadrupolar doublet must be assigned to paramagnetic ferrous species: they result probably from a small contamination by a paramagnetic phase non detected by XRD, such as siderite FeCO 3 (that would be compatible with the observation of traces of carbon as often reported on SPS sintered ceramics 44,45 ) and/or the replacement of the CoO phase by its solid solution Co 1-x Fe x O (x close to zero) (that would be compatible with the diffusion of iron cation from spinel to adjacent rock-salt grains because an interatomic diffusion in SPS sintered nanocomposites was also reported 34 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, SPS operates at moderate temperatures for short periods of time, favoring ultrafine grained and highly dense microstructures 26,27 . It is also a powerful solid-state chemical route for the preparation of single 2831 and multi-phases 3234 . The SPS technique could really overcome the limits highlighted above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exchange bias phenomenon is typically found in nanocomposites where antiferromagnetic (AFM) material is coupled with a ferromagnetic (FM) material. The coupling between two materials produces a shift in the hysteresis loop along the magnetic field axis [23][24][25]. This effect is significantly influenced by the shape of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, under the influence of uniaxial pressure, preferential grain orientation is likely to occur, which could yield extraordinary results for materials with highly anisotropic crystal structures 23,24) It has been reported that the dc pulse current during SPS is highly suitable for initiating and facilitating the reactions of precursors, yielding nanograined product 25) . This so-called reactive SPS can also synthesize materials within much shorter reaction time compared to conventional methods [25][26][27] . Thus, here we report onestep direct synthesis and simultaneous consolidation of W18O49 from commercially purchased precursors via reactive SPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%