2009
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2009.v16.n6.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the linearized local Calderón problem

Abstract: Abstract. In this article, we investigate a density problem coming from the linearization of Calderón's problem with partial data. More precisely, we prove that the set of products of harmonic functions on a bounded smooth domain Ω vanishing on any fixed closed proper subset of the boundary are dense in L 1 (Ω) in all dimensions n ≥ 2. This is proved using ideas coming from the proof of Kashiwara's Watermelon theorem [15].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we sketch the proof of Theorem 2.6. A first reduction is to show that it suffices to prove a local version of the theorem (see [DKSjU09, Section 2]). The global version follows from the local one by using ideas in the spirit of the Runge approximation theorem, developed in an unpublished work of Alessandrini, Isozaki, and Uhlmann.…”
Section: The Linearized Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we sketch the proof of Theorem 2.6. A first reduction is to show that it suffices to prove a local version of the theorem (see [DKSjU09, Section 2]). The global version follows from the local one by using ideas in the spirit of the Runge approximation theorem, developed in an unpublished work of Alessandrini, Isozaki, and Uhlmann.…”
Section: The Linearized Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let b, L > 0. Let F be an entire function in C such thate − Φ(s) h |F (s)| ≤ 1, s ∈ C, e − c 2h , when |s − L| ≤ b.Then for all r ≥ 0, there exist c ′ , δ > 0 (independent of F ) such that|F (s)| ≤ e − c ′ 2h + (Im s) 2 2hwhen |Re s| ≤ δ and |Im s| ≤ r.The proof of the lemma rests on a harmonic majorization argument, which exploits the subharmonicity of −(Im s) 2 +(Re s) 2 (see[DKSjU09, Lemma 4.1 and Remark 4.2] for the details of the proof). Next we apply Lemma 7.2 toF (s) = hT f (s, x ′ ) C f L ∞ (Ω) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It served as a substitute to the original but somewhat more involved argument of Kenig, Sjöstrand and Uhlmann in [33] also based on analytic microlocal theory. Similar ideas were used in [20] to investigate a linearization of the Calderón problem with partial data.…”
Section: Stability For the Local Radon Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.29) 4 In the present situation this means that we deform the integration contour so that its boundary remains in the the complex hyperplane y n = 0 and so that the supremum of the modulus of the exponential in the integral is as small as possible, see [17] and Example 4.1 below.…”
Section: Some Function Spaces and Their Fbi-transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is valid for the case of partial data and the linearization. It was shown in [4] that the linearization of the local DN map at the 0 potential is injective. We consider the linearization of the local DN map at any real analytic potential assuming that the local DN map is measured an an open real-analytic set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%