Automorphic Representations, L-Functions and Applications: Progress and Prospects 2005
DOI: 10.1515/9783110892703.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the local factors of representations of classical groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition (b) above ensures that Π ′ is cuspidal. To show that Π ′ is nonzero, we consider the standard L-function L(s, Π) of Π defined using the doubling zeta integral of Piatetski-Shapiro-Rallis [46], [40]. Observe that the partial L-function L S∪{v 0 } (s, Π) agrees with the partial standard L-function L S∪{v 0 } (s, Σ) of Σ, so that …”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition (b) above ensures that Π ′ is cuspidal. To show that Π ′ is nonzero, we consider the standard L-function L(s, Π) of Π defined using the doubling zeta integral of Piatetski-Shapiro-Rallis [46], [40]. Observe that the partial L-function L S∪{v 0 } (s, Π) agrees with the partial standard L-function L S∪{v 0 } (s, Σ) of Σ, so that …”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if one assumes the existence of a theory of γ-factors satisfying the usual properties (such as those listed as the "Ten Commandments" in [LR05]), then we can show that (v) holds for all representations, in which case the map L will be uniquely characterized by (iii) and (v) (with r ≤ 2 in (v)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note here a typo in [LR,(25)], where on the right-hand side of the above equation they had τ (−1) instead of (τ ⊗ χ)(−1). Moreover, it was shown in [LR] that…”
Section: Relation To Linear Casementioning
confidence: 99%