1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01393255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the local Langlands conjecture forGL(2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ; 2 /, where 1 and 2 both have conductor dividing q n 1 . In any case, the central character " f;q has conductor dividing q n 1 (see [Tu1,Proposition 3.4]). We claim then that…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ; 2 /, where 1 and 2 both have conductor dividing q n 1 . In any case, the central character " f;q has conductor dividing q n 1 (see [Tu1,Proposition 3.4]). We claim then that…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n=2 this conjecture was proven by Tunnell in [9], for (n,p)= 1 it follows from [5]. In the present paper we prove it for the case n =p.…”
Section: R(c)=r'(c) If C>pmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Let K 0 = F q ((T )) be the completion of K at v = 0. To E/K 0 there correspond an automorphic representation σ E of GL(2, K 0 ) and also a representation σ E of H * , where H/K 0 is the central division algebra of dimension 4 (see [5], [2], [13]). E being defined over K = F q (T ) and subject to (1.2), the sign w(E/K) is nothing else than the root number (e.g., [1], p. 22) of σ E .…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%