2019
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2019.2892422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Location-Dependent SIR Gain in Cellular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MODELS The locations of the users play a crucial part in their performance. Conditioning the regions (e.g., cell center and boundary) of the user of interest allows a location-dependent analysis [99], [100] for a location-specific user (LSU) in cellular networks. The objective of this section is to demonstrate the effect of the location of the target user on the SIR distribution.…”
Section: Location-dependent Analysis Of Cellularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MODELS The locations of the users play a crucial part in their performance. Conditioning the regions (e.g., cell center and boundary) of the user of interest allows a location-dependent analysis [99], [100] for a location-specific user (LSU) in cellular networks. The objective of this section is to demonstrate the effect of the location of the target user on the SIR distribution.…”
Section: Location-dependent Analysis Of Cellularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please refer to [18] for further details. Once both f k (I(t + 1), I D (t)) and f k (I D (t)) have been computed, we use (11) to obtain the conditional PDF…”
Section: Interference Power Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rayleigh fading channels are considered in [11], and shadowing is considered as noise source. BSs locations are assumed to follow a Poisson point process and user coordination is obtained by assigning each user to the nearest BS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the ergodicity of the PPP, the area fraction of two regions are equivalent to the probabilities that the typical user at the origin falls into the two regions, respectively, given by Fig. 2 shows the area fraction of the two regions with R. Remark 1: The user classification in [25] is based on the relative distance between the user and the serving BS and the interfering BSs, where the area fraction can be from 0 to 1. The user classification in this paper is based on the exclusion regions.…”
Section: User Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%