2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the magnetostratigraphic age of Nauru Basin basalts of the western Pacific Ocean and timing of Ontong Java volcanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the assumption that the formation of ∼120‐Ma‐old Ontong Java, Manihiki and Hikurangi plateaus [ Taylor , 2006] was related to the arrival of the Louisville plume head underneath the lithosphere of the paleo‐Pacific ocean is questionable because the older segment of the Louisville track has been subducted beneath the Tonga trench. Although we could not rule out a younger age of the hot spot (between 120 and 80 Ma), we preferred to keep the 120 Ma assignment because of a possible temporal association with the widespread Aptian pulse of volcanic activity in the western Pacific, traditionally attributed to a mantle plume (see Doubrovine et al [2009] and references therein for discussion). A recent study of Chandler et al [2012]showed that the reconstructions of the Ontong Java‐Manihiki‐Hikurangi LIP using the hot spot reference frames of O'Neill et al [2005], Wessel and Kroenke [2008] (WK08‐A) and a modification of the latter (WK08‐D), which allowed motion of the Hawaiian hot spot during the formation of the Emperor seamounts (83.5–47 Ma), consistently placed the igneous province 8° to 19° north to northeast of the recent position of the Louisville hot spot.…”
Section: Building Blocks Of a Moving Hot Spot Reference Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the assumption that the formation of ∼120‐Ma‐old Ontong Java, Manihiki and Hikurangi plateaus [ Taylor , 2006] was related to the arrival of the Louisville plume head underneath the lithosphere of the paleo‐Pacific ocean is questionable because the older segment of the Louisville track has been subducted beneath the Tonga trench. Although we could not rule out a younger age of the hot spot (between 120 and 80 Ma), we preferred to keep the 120 Ma assignment because of a possible temporal association with the widespread Aptian pulse of volcanic activity in the western Pacific, traditionally attributed to a mantle plume (see Doubrovine et al [2009] and references therein for discussion). A recent study of Chandler et al [2012]showed that the reconstructions of the Ontong Java‐Manihiki‐Hikurangi LIP using the hot spot reference frames of O'Neill et al [2005], Wessel and Kroenke [2008] (WK08‐A) and a modification of the latter (WK08‐D), which allowed motion of the Hawaiian hot spot during the formation of the Emperor seamounts (83.5–47 Ma), consistently placed the igneous province 8° to 19° north to northeast of the recent position of the Louisville hot spot.…”
Section: Building Blocks Of a Moving Hot Spot Reference Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to this, Fitton et al [2004] suggest that the Early Aptian phase was principally responsible for the formation of the Ontong‐Java Plateau at ∼120 Ma and that only minor volcanism occurred ∼90 Ma. This hypothesis supported by the recent drilling results of Doubrovine et al [2009] who conclude that no volumetrically important second phase of magmatism took place. It has also been suggested that the Louisville hot spot may have been responsible for the production of the Ontong‐Java Plateau and surrounding basaltic provinces [e.g., Richards et al , 1991; Antretter et al , 2004].…”
Section: Oceanic Plateausmentioning
confidence: 99%