[1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Visual Motion
DOI: 10.1109/wvm.1989.47100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mathematical foundations of smoothness constraints for the determination of optical flow and for surface reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This projection has been introduced by Nagel and Enkelmann [31,32] in the context of optic flow estimation. We use it here because of its simplicity (the underlying second order differential operator is linear) and because this method has demonstrated its performance numerous times in the context of optical flow estimations [3,4,8,14,31,32,45,47].…”
Section: The Energy Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This projection has been introduced by Nagel and Enkelmann [31,32] in the context of optic flow estimation. We use it here because of its simplicity (the underlying second order differential operator is linear) and because this method has demonstrated its performance numerous times in the context of optical flow estimations [3,4,8,14,31,32,45,47].…”
Section: The Energy Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some [5] will do it blindly, while others will do it only at certain locations ( [10]) or along certain directions ( [9]). Still others will use a robust norm to minimize the influence of the outliers ( [2,8,7]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inhomogeneous and anisotropic, image-driven h(tr(∇u∇u T + ∇v∇v T )) [2,8] inhomogeneous and isotropic, flow-driven tr h(∇u∇u T + ∇v∇v T ) [7] inhomogeneous and anisotropic, flow-driven Table 2. The six flow components that are induced by the six DOFs of a 3D rigid-body motion.…”
Section: Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, these functionals consist of two terms measuring different properties of the admissible functions: closeness to the data and smoothness. Snyder (1989) has recently classified all smoothness terms involving first-order derivatives of the components of the vector field and of the image function g(x, t), which are positive definite quadratic forms and do not couple the two components vl and v2 of the vector field. It turned out that the only physically plausible smoothness terms of this class are those of Horn & Schunck (1981) …”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Snyder (1989) has recently classified all smoothness terms which involve first-order derivatives of the flowfield u(x, t) and of the image grey-value function g(x, t). The physically plausible smoothness terms belonging to this class are known from the work of Horn and Schunck (1981) and Nagel 0987).

In this paper we discuss the possibilities of approximating the solutions to the minimization problems of Horn & Schunk (1981) andNagel (1987).

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%