Two great pioneers of Japanese scientific psychology are Yujiro Motora (1858Motora ( -1912 and Matataro Matsumoto (1865-1943. Although Motora was first interested in psychophysics, he later turned to speculative and systematic psychology (Kido, 1961). On the other hand, Matsumoto devoted himself to experimental and applied psychology more intensively than to systematic psychology. One of his main contributions was what he called 'psychocinematics' by which he meant an objecti:ve study of purposive bodily movements (Matsumoto, 1914), and it is on this account that he was called the Japanese pioneer of objective psychology (Watanabe, 1953).Matsumoto's objective view was succeeded by his students, among whom Narasaki (1922) directly advanced his master's psychocinematics, and Tanaka (1921) did a systematic study in mental work which he called 'human engineering'. However, both Matsumoto and Narasaki had never tried to substitute psychocinematics or 'mental dynamics' in Narasaki's term for the traditional psychology. On the other hand, they believed that psychocinematics or mental dynamics must be distinguished from the traditional 'pure' psychology which can be approached, according to thcm, only through introspection and not by objective methods.Pre-Watsonian bchavioristic movements as represented by Angell, Pillsbury, and Parmelee, were introduced to Japan by Ueno (1913), Otsuki (1913), and others. After reviewing Pillsbury's The Essentials of Psychology (1911), Ueno, applied psychologist, argued that psychology should be dcfined as a study of behavior in order to avoid ambiguous definitions such as a mental science or a science of consciousness. However, he did not intend to exclude consciousness per se, but instead he stated that both behavior and consciousness are the subject matter of psychology and that consciousness can be fully understood only in relation to behavior. Ueno's emphasis on behavior was weakened in his later criticism of Watsonian behaviorism in that behavioristic methods were considered only as auxiliary means to introspective methods (Ueno & Noda, 1922).Behaviorism formally cstablished by Watson in 1913 was first madc known to Japanese psychologists by Narasaki and Hayami in 1914. According to Narasaki (1914), behavioristic studies may be classified in the same category as psychocinematics mentioned above since the objective method is emphasized in both cases. However, he contended that the objective and behavioristic method is entirely different from the introspective method as things are different from mind, and thus both behavior science and psychocinematics must be distinguished from 'pure' psychology.