2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-018-1653-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the $$\mathrm {L}^p$$ L p -theory of the Navier–Stokes equations on three-dimensional bounded Lipschitz domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, of course, the Lipschitz approach to even more general non-smooth domains. Existence and analyticity of the Stokes semigroup on L p σ on Lipschitz domains is proved, for instance, in [23,28,30]. Note that the Lipschitz approach does not provide full W 2,p Sobolev regularity which, however, might be crucial for the treatment of related quasilinear problems.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, of course, the Lipschitz approach to even more general non-smooth domains. Existence and analyticity of the Stokes semigroup on L p σ on Lipschitz domains is proved, for instance, in [23,28,30]. Note that the Lipschitz approach does not provide full W 2,p Sobolev regularity which, however, might be crucial for the treatment of related quasilinear problems.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To circumvent this problem, we shall write (u(s) · ∇)u(s) as div(u(s) ⊗ u(s)) and then consider e −(t−s)A Pdiv as one composite operator on L p . That this is well-defined for 3/2−ε < p < 3+ε and a bounded Lipschitz domain Ω, was proven by the third author in [34]. To prove convergence of the iteration scheme, it will be important that u(s)⊗u(s) and [∇d(s)] ⊤ ∇d(s) exhibit the same decay rate in the time variable, because in this case, both integrands in the mild formulation of u behave similarly with respect to the time variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The following result characterises the domains of the square roots of A and B defined above. Proposition 2.3 (see [34] and [20]). Let Ω ⊂ R 3 be a bounded Lipschitz domain.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is a fatal fact as in three dimensions this condition exhibits only the interval 3/2 < p < 3 while it is crucial for the existence theory of the Navier-Stokes equations in the critical space L ∞ (0, ∞; L 3 (Ω)) to have information for p in the interval [3, 3 + ε), cf., [20,12,11,30,31] for the cases of the whole space and bounded smooth/Lipschitz domains. In the following, we review the existence proof of Lang and Méndez and point out a slight modification in order to recover the interval (2.3) for exterior Lipschitz domains Ω with connected boundary.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the study of the Stokes operator on bounded Lipschitz domains was continued by Kunstmann and Weis [22] and the first author of this article [30,31]. In [22], the property of maximal regularity and the boundedness of the H ∞ -calculus were established yielding a short proof to reveal the domain of the square root of the Stokes operator as W 1,p 0,σ (Ω), see [30]. The purpose of this paper is to continue the study of the Stokes operator in the case of exterior Lipschitz domains Ω.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%