Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2005.1498326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the maximal throughput of networks with finite buffers and its application to buffered crossbars

Abstract: Abstract-The advent of packet networks has motivated many researchers to study the performance of networks of queues in the last decade or two. However, most of the previous work assumes the availability of infinite queue-size. Instead, in this paper, we study the maximal achievable throughput in a flow-controlled lossless network with finite-queue size. In such networks, throughput depends on the packet scheduling policy utilized. As the main of this paper, we obtain a dynamic scheduling policy that achieves … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unbalanced traffic experiments use Bernoulli arrivals, and an unbalance factor determined by w [19]: when w is equal to zero (0) traffic is uniform, whereas when w is equal to one (1) traffic consists of persistent (non-conflicting) input-output port connections. Under hotspot traffic, each destination belonging to a designated set of "hot spots" receives (smooth or bursty 13 traffic at 100% collective load, uniformly from all sources; the rest of the destinations receive uniform or bursty traffic as above. Hotspots are randomly selected out of the fabric-output ports.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unbalanced traffic experiments use Bernoulli arrivals, and an unbalance factor determined by w [19]: when w is equal to zero (0) traffic is uniform, whereas when w is equal to one (1) traffic consists of persistent (non-conflicting) input-output port connections. Under hotspot traffic, each destination belonging to a designated set of "hot spots" receives (smooth or bursty 13 traffic at 100% collective load, uniformly from all sources; the rest of the destinations receive uniform or bursty traffic as above. Hotspots are randomly selected out of the fabric-output ports.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each cycle one partial permutation can be realized. Existing algorithms for choosing these matchings, such as iSLIP [McKeown 1999] and PIM [Anderson et al 1993], guarantee 1 2 -MCMs and it has been shown [Giaccone et al 2005;McKeown et al 1996] that (approximate) MWMs have good throughput guarantees, where edge weights are based on queue-length. See also Leonardi et al [2003], Shah and Kopikare [2002], and .…”
Section: Remarks On Approximate Weighted Matching and Its Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is at most one arrival or departure from each X ij in each time slot, we obtain that for any schedule P where the last inequality is from (7).…”
Section: Ws(n+l)(n+l) 2:: Max(ws(n) (N+l) Wh(n+l)(n+l))-c1 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], the authors proposed a distributed scheduling algorithm and derived a relationship between throughput and the size of crosspoint buffers. However, to achieve 100% throughput, it needed a buffer of infinite size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%