2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2005.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the maximum value of Jacobi polynomials

Abstract: A remarkable inequality, with utterly explicit constants, established by Erdélyi, Magnus, and Nevai, states that for > − 1 2 , the orthonormal Jacobi polynomials P[Erdélyi et al., Generalized Jacobi weights, Christoffel functions, and Jacobi polynomials, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 25 (1994), 602-614]. They conjectured that the real order of the maximum is O( 1/2 ).Here we will make half a way towards this conjecture by proving a new inequality which improves their result by a factor of order ( 1 + 1 k ) −1/3 . We als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with some absolute constants c 1 , c 2 [7]. Using a similar method in the Hermite case, the inequalities (with two rather poor constants)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with some absolute constants c 1 , c 2 [7]. Using a similar method in the Hermite case, the inequalities (with two rather poor constants)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second construction could be the most straightforward one for extending the preconditioned framework proposed in §4 of the present paper, even at the price of heavier computations with bounds on Gegenbauer polynomials taken from [38,31]. Finally, the "wavelet prolate functions" studied in [33,25] may also be convenient, at least for the techniques developed in our §3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We deduce this result from the following two theorems. The first, which has been established in [7], gives a sharp inequality for the interval containing all the local maxima of the function M α,β k (x). The second one will be proven here and in fact demonstrates equioscillatory behaviour of M α k (x, d) under an appropriate choice of d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%