2016
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2015.2499841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Measurable Range of Absorption Cross Section in a Reverberation Chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These PCBs also show greater variation with frequency, particularly at lower frequencies when they also have a greater difference between themselves. Note that the measurement uncertainty is greater in the low frequency band, particularly from 2-3 GHz, due to a lower number of independent field samples and larger amount of nonstochastic energy in the chamber [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These PCBs also show greater variation with frequency, particularly at lower frequencies when they also have a greater difference between themselves. Note that the measurement uncertainty is greater in the low frequency band, particularly from 2-3 GHz, due to a lower number of independent field samples and larger amount of nonstochastic energy in the chamber [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This size of chamber was necessary in order for the measurable range of the ACS to cover the expected range of the PCB ACSs [15]. The experimental setup is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Measurement Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…σ is the standard deviation of the ACS over a number of measurements with either different stirrer positions and/or over a range of frequencies. In[10], Flintoft et al include a model to calculate the uncertainty of ACS measurements in a reverberation chamber. Both (4) and the method in[10] led to similar uncertainty, which is about 20%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%