On the measurement and benchmarking of research impact among active logistics scholars

Abstract

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:368933 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services. AbstractPurpose -Scholarly interest in carrying out impactful research continues to remain high. Yet, given that citations of scholarly work can never decrease with time, traditional measures of research impact (such as raw counts of citations) unwittingly discriminate against early career researchers and also make it hard to identify future high impact scholars. In the current study, the paper compares several commonly used measures of research impact to identify one that best normalizes for the effect of career stage. The measure thus applies equally across most career stages, providing a usable impact benchmark for logistics scholars irrespective of seniority level. The paper also aims to present benchmarks on that metric to help logistics scholars identify their research impact vis-à -vis their peers. Design/methodology/approach -Bibliometric data on the research of 702 logistics scholars were collected and analyzed by dividing the scholars into different cohorts based on seniority. Comparisons of different citation metrics were then made. Findings -The h-rate provides the most appropriate basis for comparing research impact across logistics scholars of various career stages. Benchmark h-rates are provided for scholars to identify their research impact. Originality/value -The authors are unaware of any other work in the logistics field that measures the research impact of logistics scholars in this manner.

Doctoral dissertations in logistics and supply chain management: a review of Nordic contributions from 2009 to 2014

“…This trend supports the predictions previously made by Zachariassen and Arlbjørn [41]. One plausible explanation for this development might be an increased amount of public and private resource allocation to research environments based on publications in internationally recognized peer-reviewed journals as well as measures such as impact indicators and H-index (see, e.g., [27]).…”

“…A reason for this might be an increasing pressure to publish at the universities [21], which might be driving PhD students to learn and master the craft of publishing from the very start of their career. No matter what, the culture of many research departments is characterized by a high focus on performance in terms of publications in ranked journals [2,20,22,27]. Therefore, by choosing an article-based dissertation, PhD students might have a better opportunity to work together with other PhD students and senior researchers; in doing so, they also learn how to ''play the game.…”

Scholarly Productivity and Impact: Developing a Quantifiable, Norm‐based Benchmarking Methodology for Academic Emergency Medicine

“…Used together with publication count, which demonstrates the overall magnitude of an individual's research performance, citations per publication is an alternative to the h‐index for benchmarking in emergency medicine. Citations per publication is a Snowball metric and has been used in efforts to benchmark individual academic performance in the field of logistics . Choi et al .…”

A contribution to the study of organizational behavior: The individual, group and organizational levels of analysis

“…Procena naučnih rezultata uopšte, a isto tako i u oblasti organizacionog ponašanja, bazira se na kvalitativnim bibliometrijskim indikatorima, zasnovanim na citatima, koji se u nauci smatraju indikatorom kvaliteta. U radu je usvojena sve učestalija praksa ocenjivanja uticaja realizovanih istraživanja korišćenjem softverskog programa Harzing's Publish or Perish (2013) sa ciljem identifikovanja najcitiranijih knjiga i autorâ iz oblasti organizacionog ponašanja (Rao, Iyengar, & Goldsby, 2013;Amara & Landry, 2012;Halverson et al, 2012;Hodge et al, 2011;Serenko & Bontis, 2009;Van Aalst, 2010). Pomenuti program određuje broj citata određenog autora ili knjige korišćenjem besplatnog Google-ovog servisa pod nazivom Google Akademik (Google Schoolarhttp://scholar.google.com/), koji je namenjen pretraživanju i lociranju naučne literature (Haley, 2014;Soutar & Murphy, 2009).…”