Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This study presents the results of research on the influence of different contents of copper in aluminium alloys based on the 6xxx series on mechanical and structural properties. The investigation started with the alloying, and casting four billet variants with different copper content—0.8% Cu; 2B—1% Cu; 3A—1.2% Cu; and 3B—1.4% Cu. The prepared materials were homogenised and extruded on a 500T horizontal press with two different process temperatures and ram speeds ranging from 1 mm/s to 9 mm/s. After heat treating to the T6 and T5 tempers, their mechanical properties were tested. On this basis, the two most promising alloys 2A and 3B were selected and subjected to further tests. After extrusion and heat treatment of the profiles (to F, T1, T2, T5, and T5510), their mechanical properties were determined to select the preferred process parameters. Finally, a structural test based on crystallographic orientation based on the EBSD technique and TEM observations allowed for the characterisation of grain size, dispersoids, and phase analysis. Bright-field (BF) analysis allowed us to compare the deformed areas for T1, T5, and T5510 temperatures. The results showed significant growth in the mechanical properties of all the subjected alloys, and the best properties were shown for a Cu content of 1.4% with a tensile strength of 460 MPa and an elongation of 16% (T5510 tempering). The structural test showed an average grain size of 18 µm to 23 µm and solid solution decomposition differences for different heat-treating parameters.
This study presents the results of research on the influence of different contents of copper in aluminium alloys based on the 6xxx series on mechanical and structural properties. The investigation started with the alloying, and casting four billet variants with different copper content—0.8% Cu; 2B—1% Cu; 3A—1.2% Cu; and 3B—1.4% Cu. The prepared materials were homogenised and extruded on a 500T horizontal press with two different process temperatures and ram speeds ranging from 1 mm/s to 9 mm/s. After heat treating to the T6 and T5 tempers, their mechanical properties were tested. On this basis, the two most promising alloys 2A and 3B were selected and subjected to further tests. After extrusion and heat treatment of the profiles (to F, T1, T2, T5, and T5510), their mechanical properties were determined to select the preferred process parameters. Finally, a structural test based on crystallographic orientation based on the EBSD technique and TEM observations allowed for the characterisation of grain size, dispersoids, and phase analysis. Bright-field (BF) analysis allowed us to compare the deformed areas for T1, T5, and T5510 temperatures. The results showed significant growth in the mechanical properties of all the subjected alloys, and the best properties were shown for a Cu content of 1.4% with a tensile strength of 460 MPa and an elongation of 16% (T5510 tempering). The structural test showed an average grain size of 18 µm to 23 µm and solid solution decomposition differences for different heat-treating parameters.
The present study aimed to enhance the efficiency and efficacy of the Al/Cu joint production process implemented by the company VEMID Ltd., Jagodina, Serbia, by attaining sound joints within a very short welding time. For this purpose, the present study aimed at investigating the accuracy and the quality of the continuous drive friction welding (CDFW) process, as well as the optimum combination of CDFW parameters with highest joint efficiency in terms of investigated properties. The accuracy was estimated through an analysis of temperature–time curves recorded during CDFW using an infrared camera. The quality was evaluated through an investigation of the properties of Al/Cu joints produced using different friction (66.7, 88.9, and 133.3 MPa) and forging (88.9, 222.2, and 355.6 MPa) pressures and a constant total welding time (4 s) and rotational speed (2100 rpm). Thermal imaging with an infrared camera demonstrated that the actual total welding time was 15% longer compared to the nominal value. This was attributed to the slow pressure response of the pneumatic brake system. The relative changes in the maximum surface temperature (TMS) during the CDFW process corresponded to changes in welding pressures, indicating the potential of the thermal imaging method for monitoring and assessing this process. A preliminary investigation demonstrated that Al/Cu joints produced using welding pressures less than 88.9 MPa often displayed the presence of non-joined micro-regions at the Al/Cu interface and a significant thickness of interfacial Al2Cu (up to 1 µm). However, when friction pressure was set at 66.7 MPa, an increase in the forging pressure to 222.2 MPa eliminated the presence of non-joined micro-regions and reduced the thickness of Al2Cu to 0.5 µm on the average level. These Al/Cu joints achieved the highest joint efficiencies in terms of strength (100%) and ductility (61%). They exhibited an electrical conductivity higher than 92% of the theoretical value. A further increase in any welding pressure produced similar or deteriorated properties, accompanied by an increase in the consumption of raw materials and energy. Such turn of events was counterproductive to the original goal of increasing the efficiency and efficacy of the CDFW process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.