2009
DOI: 10.1039/b907628j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mechanism of formation of vesicles from poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(caprolactone) copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike degradable polymersomes formed from blending "bio-inert" and hydrolysable components, 28, 29 PEO- b -PCL-based vesicles are fully bioresorbable, 30 leaving no potentially toxic byproducts upon their degradation. In contrast to other degradable (polypeptide-, polyester-, or polyanhydride-based) polymersomes, 24, 25, 3133 PEO(2K)- b -PCL(12K)-based vesicles are formed through spontaneous self-assembly of the pure amphiphilic diblock copolymer, offering manufacturing advantages in terms of cost and safety. Further, these fully bioresorbable polymersomes possess in vivo drug release kinetics appropriate for potential intravascular drug delivery applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike degradable polymersomes formed from blending "bio-inert" and hydrolysable components, 28, 29 PEO- b -PCL-based vesicles are fully bioresorbable, 30 leaving no potentially toxic byproducts upon their degradation. In contrast to other degradable (polypeptide-, polyester-, or polyanhydride-based) polymersomes, 24, 25, 3133 PEO(2K)- b -PCL(12K)-based vesicles are formed through spontaneous self-assembly of the pure amphiphilic diblock copolymer, offering manufacturing advantages in terms of cost and safety. Further, these fully bioresorbable polymersomes possess in vivo drug release kinetics appropriate for potential intravascular drug delivery applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3739 As the optimal particle size for prolonged blood stream circulation is ~80–150 nm, and the intracellular uptake of particles having diameters larger than 1 µm is minimal, 3739 nanometer-sized bioresorbable vesicles are critical for in vivo drug delivery of encapsulated therapeutics. Congruent with these requirements, Butler and coworkers 25 have further examined the formation of nano-sized vesicles from a handful of commercially available PEO- b -PCL block copolymer compositions featuring mostly small PEO chain lengths (300–2000) and low copolymer molecular weights (M w : 2.6–7.8K) by the co-solvent injection method. 25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diblock copolymer micelles are expected to be kinetically trapped in a binary solvent mixture having a water concentration of 25% v/v. 38 The solution was stirred for 10 minutes at room temperature, then transferred to 3,500 MWCO tubing (Snakeskin), and dialyzed against 2 L of deionized water for two days with at least three exchanges of water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, turbidity was used as an established method for monitoring the critical solvent concentration for micelle formation. 16 The solution was monitored for 4 h, and the increasing turbidity correlated with the appearance of larger particles in the TEM micrographs over time ( Figure 6). A distinct series of morphological transitions (sphere, to cylinder, to network, to vesicle, to LCM) was not observed via TEM in this experiment as a result of the solution not being mixed and local inhomogeneities in solvent conditions, causing nonuniform particle formation and growth.…”
Section: Macromoleculesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…19 The second is primarily due to miscibility and involves the solvent influence over the initial aggregation number (N agg ) of the assembly event, due to the formation of phase separated droplets upon water addition. 16 The third is on the kinetics of formation where more viscous solvents will reduce unimer exchange during assembly. 71 The three solvents chosen for comparison were DMF (ε = 36.7 F/ m), DMSO (ε = 46.7 F/m), and ACN (ε = 37.5 F/m).…”
Section: Macromoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%