2008
DOI: 10.1134/s1064562408010018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Mehler formula for Hermite polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also plot the entanglement of an ideal two-mode squeezed state (39), using the mapping (41) to convert the squeezing parameter r to interaction time. For the ideal two-mode squeezed state, the entanglement increases towards a maximally entangled state, as can be directly seen from (39) where there is an equal superposition of pairs of spin Fock states. Such a state is never attained in our protocol due to the binomial factors as discussed above.…”
Section: Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also plot the entanglement of an ideal two-mode squeezed state (39), using the mapping (41) to convert the squeezing parameter r to interaction time. For the ideal two-mode squeezed state, the entanglement increases towards a maximally entangled state, as can be directly seen from (39) where there is an equal superposition of pairs of spin Fock states. Such a state is never attained in our protocol due to the binomial factors as discussed above.…”
Section: Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One difference between the approximated distribution and the atomic entangled state is that probability distri- butions of the former tend to broaden as the number correlations become stronger, while the latter distributions stay within a fixed envelope. This occurs because in the infinitely squeezed limit the mapped two-mode squeezed state (39) is…”
Section: Analytic Approximation Of Probability Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which was proved combinatorially by Foata [97] (see also [98,99]). For several extensions and generalizations of the Mehler formula (39), the reader is referred to [100][101][102][103][104][105]).…”
Section: Generating Functions Of Orthogonal Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%