2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1809.03638
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the min-max width of unit volume three-spheres

Lucas Ambrozio,
Rafael Montezuma

Abstract: How large can be the width of Riemannian three-spheres of the same volume in the same conformal class? If a maximum value is attained, how does a maximising metric look like? What happens as the conformal class changes? In this paper, we investigate these and other related questions, focusing on the context of Simon-Smith minmax theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between our theorem and Proposition 1.4.1 of [2] is that in free boundary case, we can not rule out the case when {Σ i } is not properly embedded (Σ ∩ ∂M = ∅), due to the lack of convexity of ∂M . Readers can see [6] for a possible example of non-properly embedded free boundary minimal hypersurface in an Euclidean domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between our theorem and Proposition 1.4.1 of [2] is that in free boundary case, we can not rule out the case when {Σ i } is not properly embedded (Σ ∩ ∂M = ∅), due to the lack of convexity of ∂M . Readers can see [6] for a possible example of non-properly embedded free boundary minimal hypersurface in an Euclidean domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Here we include an abstract theorem used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 and 1.2., for the proof see Theorem B.1 of [2]. Theorem 4.2.…”
Section: Compactness Theorem and Equidistribution Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let RP 3 be the three-dimensional real projective space, and F denote the non-empty set consisting of all embedded surfaces in RP 3 that are diffeomorphic to the two-dimensional projective plane RP 2 . Given a Riemannian metric g on RP 3 , we define…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%