2016
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2015.0722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Minimization Over Sparse Symmetric Sets: Projections, Optimality Conditions, and Algorithms

Abstract: We consider the problem of minimizing a general continuously differentiable function over symmetric sets under sparsity constraints. These type of problems are generally hard to solve because the sparsity constraint induces a combinatorial constraint into the problem, rendering the feasible set to be nonconvex. We begin with a study of the properties of the orthogonal projection operator onto sparse symmetric sets. Based on this study, we derive efficient methods for computing sparse projections under various … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) As already mentioned the u-step, defined through (6.2), reduces to the computation of the proximal mapping of the function h. Thus, this step can be efficiently computed when the proximal map of h is accessible, i.e., via an and explicit formula or via simple computations, see for instance, [26,13,6] for interesting examples.…”
Section: Two Fundamental Instances Of a ρ And The Corresponding Albummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) As already mentioned the u-step, defined through (6.2), reduces to the computation of the proximal mapping of the function h. Thus, this step can be efficiently computed when the proximal map of h is accessible, i.e., via an and explicit formula or via simple computations, see for instance, [26,13,6] for interesting examples.…”
Section: Two Fundamental Instances Of a ρ And The Corresponding Albummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7)] (with parameter β = 0.2), and the nonmonotone accelerated FBS (denoted AFBS) proposed in[26, Alg. 2] for fully nonconvex problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing algorithms for handling sparsity constrained optimization problems in a direct manner are mainly focused on the problems with symmetric sets as feasible regions which admit efficient computation for the corresponding projection operators [14][15][16]. However, such projected gradient type methods can not be extended to a general SLP problem, since the corresponding feasible region lacks the symmetry and the underlying projection is generally difficult to compute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%