2003
DOI: 10.1017/s096402820300003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the misinterpretation of the Aluridja kinship system type (Australian Western Desert)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The section systems clearly spread in relatively recent times (the last few thousand years at most; see McConvell (in press‐b.) They did not reach all the areas where Kariera kinship systems existed (such as Northern Cape York Peninsula), but also spread and took root in areas with different kinship systems (such as the Western Desert, see Dousset ; Elkin ).…”
Section: Kariera Kinship and Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The section systems clearly spread in relatively recent times (the last few thousand years at most; see McConvell (in press‐b.) They did not reach all the areas where Kariera kinship systems existed (such as Northern Cape York Peninsula), but also spread and took root in areas with different kinship systems (such as the Western Desert, see Dousset ; Elkin ).…”
Section: Kariera Kinship and Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this area, as in Kariyarra, the daughter term also refers to the ‘parallel niece’ same‐sex sibling's daughter, and the son term refers to the ‘parallel nephew’, the same‐sex sibling's son. The cross‐nieces and nephews are referred to by different terms generally but there may be an overlay which substitutes the parallel‐nibling term for the cross‐term in the context of close kin (Dousset reports this for Ngaanyatjarra: Dousset :57; :269) but it may be more widespread). For further discussion of overlays and overlaps see following section and McConvell and Hendery (in preparation).…”
Section: Different Patterns Of Child Terms In Karieramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here I will not go into a detailed discussion of the complexities, since I have addressed them elsewhere (Dousset 2002(Dousset , 2003b(Dousset , 2012; however we need to briefly recall the issue, as resolving it has created a new problem. In an era during which kinship had been the bastion of anthropological inquiry, Western Desert or Aluridja kinship, as it was called, was considered highly unconventional, intermingling aspects of various so-called systems in one and the same place (Tjon Sie Fat 1998), or was even dismissed as being 'aberrant' (Lévi-Strauss 1967[1947, 231, 251 and 249 figure 56) and hardly worth further inquiry, to quote just these two examples.…”
Section: The Problem(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the A n angu Pitjantjatjara Yunkunytjatjara Lands (APY) where the author worked as a teacher, many of the ACEOs had kinship connections to the students they taught and they routinely acted as an adoptive or foster parent. Dousset (2003) states that in Indigenous communities on the APY Lands, nominal adopted children are ‘recognised as having identical ties to the community or locale to which her own children affiliate, for adoption is considered to create similar ties to birth ties’ (p. 24). Kinship connections and correlating mutual obligations go beyond ‘blood’ ties and incorporate Country and location in many communities.…”
Section: Kinship and Migration Between Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%