2018
DOI: 10.1214/17-aop1230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mixing time of Kac’s walk and other high-dimensional Gibbs samplers with constraints

Abstract: Determining the total variation mixing time of Kac's random walk on the special orthogonal group SO(n) has been a long-standing open problem. In this paper, we construct a novel non-Markovian coupling for bounding this mixing time. The analysis of our coupling entails controlling the smallest singular value of a certain random matrix with highly dependent entries. The dependence of the entries in our matrix makes it not-amenable to existing techniques in random matrix theory. To circumvent this difficulty, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergence of the Kac's random walk has been studied by various authors in different senses. In the current discussion, the focus is on convergence in Wasserstein distance which metrizes the weak convergence; for a review of the literature see Pak and Sidenko (2007); Oliveira (2009); Pillai and Smith (2016). The best known bound on the mixing-time in Wasserstein distance is obtained by Oliveira (2009), providing an upper bound of order n 2 log n on the mixing-time which is at most a factor log n away from optimal.…”
Section: Benchmark Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence of the Kac's random walk has been studied by various authors in different senses. In the current discussion, the focus is on convergence in Wasserstein distance which metrizes the weak convergence; for a review of the literature see Pak and Sidenko (2007); Oliveira (2009); Pillai and Smith (2016). The best known bound on the mixing-time in Wasserstein distance is obtained by Oliveira (2009), providing an upper bound of order n 2 log n on the mixing-time which is at most a factor log n away from optimal.…”
Section: Benchmark Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%