1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00191100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the modified Westergaard equations for certain plane crag problems

Abstract: An error in Westergaard's equation for a certain class of plane crack problems, onginaily pointed out by Slh, is briefly discussed anew. The source of the difficulty is traced to an oversight in an earlier work by MacGregor, upon whose work Westergaard based his equations. Several examples of interest illustrating the consequences of the necessary correction to these equations are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress field of a microcrack subject to a uniform surface traction can be simply expressed in terms of the Westergaard stress function (Westergaard, 1939;Sih, 1966;Eftis and Liebowitz, 1972). The appropriate stress function is…”
Section: The Iterative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress field of a microcrack subject to a uniform surface traction can be simply expressed in terms of the Westergaard stress function (Westergaard, 1939;Sih, 1966;Eftis and Liebowitz, 1972). The appropriate stress function is…”
Section: The Iterative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, they firmly support the UM approach to characterizing the tear crack profile in the BSE. One can see that the crack-mouth compliances calculated from the Eftis-Liebowitz equation [47] are lower than the measured values (Figs. 9 and 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…References [10][11][12][13][14][15] clarify this and show that completeness requires the existence of the constant A appearing in (6) and (7). On the other hand, for the problems treated in this paper the normal stresses in the x-and y-directions at infinity are either equal to each other or equal to zero, i.e.…”
Section: K= 3 -4 V = (3 -V)/(~ + V)mentioning
confidence: 99%