1969
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.23-0685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Molecular Structure of Dimanganese Decarcarbonyl, Mn2(CO)10.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The other experimental determinations of the Mn-Mn bond length by X-ray diffraction at room temperature 28 and at 74 K 29 give shorter bonds, i.e., 2.923 and 2.895 Å, respectively. Previous theoretical studies stressed that the Mn-Mn bond has a very shallow potential well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 The other experimental determinations of the Mn-Mn bond length by X-ray diffraction at room temperature 28 and at 74 K 29 give shorter bonds, i.e., 2.923 and 2.895 Å, respectively. Previous theoretical studies stressed that the Mn-Mn bond has a very shallow potential well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6 collects the results of our calculations along with the structural data obtained by X-ray diffraction at 74 K 29 and by electron diffraction in the gas phase. 27 The experimental parameters shown in the table are averaged over bond lengths and bond angles that would be equivalent in perfect D 4d symmetry. The uncertainties are given in brackets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecule of Mn 2 (CO) 10 exists in a struc-ture with D 4d symmetry (Scheme 1), and the same structure was also found for the optimized geometry in our calculations. The calculated geometrical parameters, together with the corresponding experimental values, 22,40,41 are summarized in the Table 1. The agreement between experimental and calculated values is fairly satisfactory.…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different geometries were used as the results appeared to be strongly geometry dependent. Two of these geometries are experimental, 71,72 while the third was a BP-optimized geometry of ref 70 (Table 6, row 9), which was also used in unpublished ∆SCF test calculations. 73 Further technical details concern the convergence of the SCF procedure, the numerical integration accuracy, the criterion for neglecting tails of functions in regions of space where they are close to zero, the convergence of the iterative procedure for solving the excitation energy eigenvalue equation (eq 2), and the criterion for the orthonormality of the trial vectors in this procedure.…”
Section: Technical Details Of the Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%