2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the multiphysics modeling challenges for metal additive manufacturing processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen this covers the full range of scales in the flow problem. Multi-scale simulations [12,13] can combine several approaches such as Discrete Element Models (DEM) with Finite Element (FE) or Finite Volume (FV) continuum models in the same simulation. The FE/FV is employed to solve a boundary value problem, while using the DEM to derive the required nonlinear material responses at each Gauss integration point.…”
Section: Computational Modelling Of Granular Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen this covers the full range of scales in the flow problem. Multi-scale simulations [12,13] can combine several approaches such as Discrete Element Models (DEM) with Finite Element (FE) or Finite Volume (FV) continuum models in the same simulation. The FE/FV is employed to solve a boundary value problem, while using the DEM to derive the required nonlinear material responses at each Gauss integration point.…”
Section: Computational Modelling Of Granular Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the part has to be manufacturable with one or more AM or SM capabilities [13]. Manufacturability constraints can be of both kinematic and physical types; for instance, accessibility in SM [7,8] and post-processing of AM (e.g., support removal [16]) are of predominantly kinematic nature, whereas achieving desired material properties in AM requires in situ physical analysis [17]. With few exceptions (e.g., TO for AM with minimized support [18]) TO algorithms are not developed with manufacturability provisions built into their objective functions.…”
Section: Kinematic Physical and Manufacturing Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation gives many details about thermal history during printing [7,[14][15][16][17], and the computational results could be used for the optimization of the manufacturing process. There are some researches that coupled macroscale thermal simulation coupled with mesoscale microstructural evaluation [18][19][20][21]. There are several published kinds of research on mesoscale microstructural simulations for powder bedbased additive manufacturing in the first layer of the print [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%