“…This brings us to the hypothesis that the frequency of acoustic signals may be sexually selected, if frequency acts as an indicator of an individual’s size, dominance or fighting ability. In various taxa, the frequency of male vocalisations indeed seems to indicate individual body size and can influence territory establishment (or other forms of male − male competition), attractiveness (female choice, based on the ability to discern male size differences by vocal frequency) and ultimately an individual’s reproductive success (Morris and Yoon, 1989; Apicella et al ., 2007; Charlton et al ., 2007; Hardouin et al ., 2007; Vannoni and McElligott, 2008; Forstmeier et al ., 2009; Brumm and Goymann, 2017; Kirschel et al ., 2020). Thus, if low‐frequency sounds are advantageous in inter‐ and intrasexual interactions (Davies and Halliday, 1978; Wagner, 1989; Briefer et al ., 2010; Bro‐Jørgensen and Beeston, 2015; but see Fischer et al ., 2004), we predict correlated evolution of male vocal frequency and indices of the intensity of sexual selection such as male‐biased sexual size dimorphism (Trivers, 1972; Fairbairn, 1997).…”