2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of candidate luminous blue variables in M 33

Abstract: Context. Luminous blue variables (LBVs) are a class of highly unstable stars that have been proposed to play a critical role in massive stellar evolution as well as being the progenitors of some of the most luminous supernovae known. However the physical processes underlying their characteristic instabilities are currently unknown. Aims. In order to provide observational constraints on this behaviour we have initiated a pilot study of the population of (candidate) LBVs in the Local Group galaxy M 33. Methods. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be misleading to classify these stars as BHGs, since LBVs have spectral and wind properties markedly distinct from BHGs (Clark et al 2012b). Despite having similar T eff as BHGs, LBVs typically have lower υ ∞ and higherṀ than BHGs (Clark et al 2012a). However, there seems to be a smooth transition (and even some overlap) between BHG and LBV properties, which makes it challenging to draw a firm line dividing the two classes.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would be misleading to classify these stars as BHGs, since LBVs have spectral and wind properties markedly distinct from BHGs (Clark et al 2012b). Despite having similar T eff as BHGs, LBVs typically have lower υ ∞ and higherṀ than BHGs (Clark et al 2012a). However, there seems to be a smooth transition (and even some overlap) between BHG and LBV properties, which makes it challenging to draw a firm line dividing the two classes.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we recognize that formally there is no "LBV" spectral classification, we opted to use this classification since there is no objective spectral classification criteria of stars with winds denser than those of BHGs and that have 8000 K T eff 25000 K. The spectra of these stars have been commonly referred to in the literature as "P Cygnitype", "iron", and "slash" stars (see, e.g., Walborn & Fitzpatrick 2000;Clark et al 2012a). In addition, we subdivide the LBVs in hot LBV" and "cool LBV" according to the spectral morphology, following in general lines the classification scheme from Massey et al (2007) and Clark et al (2012a). Hot LBVs have strong or moderate He  lines showing P Cygni profiles.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some were observed spectroscopically because the stars were known to have emission as shown by narrow-band Hα imaging (e.g., King et al 1998;Massey et al 2007a), or due to UV-excess (Massey et al 1996), or simply discovered "accidentally" as part of spectroscopic surveys, such as that of Massey (2006) and the present paper. Many of these "candidate" LBVs have now been shown to have photometric and/or spectral variability characteristic of true LBVs (Clark et al 2012;Lee et al 2014;Humphreys et al 2015;Sholukhova et al 2015). It is not clear what these cLBVs would have to do to be sanctified as true LBVs; the criteria needed seem to have been applied inconsistently and somewhat idiosyncratically within the literature.…”
Section: New Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that have spectrum similar to observed bona-fide LBVs, such as AG Car, P Cygni, and HR Car, have their spectral type listed as LBVs. While we recognize that formally there is no "LBV" spectral classification, we opted to use this classification since there is no objective spectral classification criteria of stars with dense winds that have 8000 K < ∼ T eff < ∼ 25 000 K. The spectra of these stars have been commonly referred to in the literature as "P Cygni-type", "iron", and "slash" stars (see, e.g., Walborn & Fitzpatrick 2000;Clark et al 2012a). The results of our spectral classification of the SN progenitors are summarized in the last column of Table 2.…”
Section: Spectra and Spectral Type Classification Of Sn Progenitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%