2017
DOI: 10.9793/elsj.33.2_415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Nature of English Gerunds

Abstract: and the 7th International Spring Forum of the English Linguistic Society of Japan held at Doshisha University. My deepest appreciation goes to Nobuaki Nishioka whose comments and suggestions were of inestimable value for my study. I would also like to express my gratitude to Stephen Laker for his kind help in proofreading and useful comments. Special thanks are due to two anonymous reviewers, who raised a number of questions and provided numerous suggestions. I am also indebted to Hiroyoshi Tanaka, Christopher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(20) I remember [ Ger you winning the lottery] and [ CP that your family roared with joy]. (Shimokariya (2017: 419), brackets and labels in original) If a that-clause were CP, CG should be CP rather than DP/NP/nP, as Shimokariya (2017) argues. However, (20) is accounted for by the proposed analysis coupled with Takahashi's ( 2010) assumption that that-clauses are preceded by an implicit determiner, as illustrated in ( 21 20) is reanalyzed as the coordination of two nominal expressions, and thus is not problematic to the present analysis.…”
Section: An Alternative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) I remember [ Ger you winning the lottery] and [ CP that your family roared with joy]. (Shimokariya (2017: 419), brackets and labels in original) If a that-clause were CP, CG should be CP rather than DP/NP/nP, as Shimokariya (2017) argues. However, (20) is accounted for by the proposed analysis coupled with Takahashi's ( 2010) assumption that that-clauses are preceded by an implicit determiner, as illustrated in ( 21 20) is reanalyzed as the coordination of two nominal expressions, and thus is not problematic to the present analysis.…”
Section: An Alternative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%