2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2010.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of equilibria in a Downsian model with candidate valence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incumbent government was so unpopular that former ALP leader Bill Hayden quipped that "a drover's dog could lead the Labor Party to victory, the way the country is and the way the opinion polls are showing up..." 12 During the election and in government, the party-whose constitution still declares it to have "the objective of the democratic socialization of industry, production, distribution and exchange"-promoted tariff reductions, tax reforms, limits on union activity, transitioning from centralized bargaining to enterprise bargaining, privatization of government enterprises, and banking deregulation. Aragones and Palfrey (2002) and Hummel (2010) characterize equilibria in a Downsian setup with purely office-motivated candidates and a deterministic net valence advantage. As in our setting, the advantaged candidate benefits from raising the salience of this valence advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incumbent government was so unpopular that former ALP leader Bill Hayden quipped that "a drover's dog could lead the Labor Party to victory, the way the country is and the way the opinion polls are showing up..." 12 During the election and in government, the party-whose constitution still declares it to have "the objective of the democratic socialization of industry, production, distribution and exchange"-promoted tariff reductions, tax reforms, limits on union activity, transitioning from centralized bargaining to enterprise bargaining, privatization of government enterprises, and banking deregulation. Aragones and Palfrey (2002) and Hummel (2010) characterize equilibria in a Downsian setup with purely office-motivated candidates and a deterministic net valence advantage. As in our setting, the advantaged candidate benefits from raising the salience of this valence advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The main mechanism that drives the entry of candidates in my model is the citizens' uncertainty about the candidates' valence. This makes my paper closely related to the literature on valence and the effect of non-positional issues on electoral competition (Aragones and Palfrey, 2002;Aragonès and Xefteris, 2012;Hummel, 2010;Stokes, 1963). A large part of the literature on valence has focused on the relationship between quality and the endogenous policy positioning of two fixed candidates.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 77%
“…116 With respect to both kinds of e¢ ciency, the sequential voting method is slightly more e¢ cient but most of the di¤erences are either not signi…cantly di¤erent from zero or signi…cant but small in magnitude. In both cases, as expected, there is little di¤erence in informational e¢ ciency and somewhat greater di¤erence in economic e¢ ciency.…”
Section: Condorcet Jury Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%