2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-2089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Nature of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models –A Priori or A Posteriori? Mechanistic or Empirical?

Abstract: Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models explicitly incorporate tissue-specific blood flows, partition coefficients, and metabolic processes. Since PBPK models are derived using physiologic parameters and interactions of the compound with tissue components, these models are considered to be “bottom up” as opposed to “top down”. Modeling approaches can be characterized as either a posteriori (observational) or a priori (based solely on theory). Furthermore, approaches can be mechanistic (structure an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discussion is necessarily limited to conventional non-permeabilitylimited models of hepatic clearance for two main reasons: the historical predominance of drugs not limited by permeability in their hepatic uptake and the lack of distinction of nonmetabolic rate-limiting processes within the available in vitro data. Extended liver clearance models may be appropriate for an increasing number of drugs due to reliance on uptake transport, and indeed lack of in vitro distinction of such processes has been suggested as a reason for underprediction of clearance (Chiba et al, 2009;Patilea-Vrana and Unadkat, 2016;Korzekwa and Nagar, 2017). However, this report attempts to focus on more general prediction trends.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The discussion is necessarily limited to conventional non-permeabilitylimited models of hepatic clearance for two main reasons: the historical predominance of drugs not limited by permeability in their hepatic uptake and the lack of distinction of nonmetabolic rate-limiting processes within the available in vitro data. Extended liver clearance models may be appropriate for an increasing number of drugs due to reliance on uptake transport, and indeed lack of in vitro distinction of such processes has been suggested as a reason for underprediction of clearance (Chiba et al, 2009;Patilea-Vrana and Unadkat, 2016;Korzekwa and Nagar, 2017). However, this report attempts to focus on more general prediction trends.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As discussed previously (Korzekwa and Nagar, 2017b), eqs. 5-7 indicate that the K pu,tissue value, and ultimately the unbound V ss value, should be proportional to K pu,BC (eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The K p,dPL method considers binding to neutral lipids such as triglycerides and neutral phospholipids in membranes, with acidic phospholipids considered separately (Rodgers et al, 2005;Rodgers and Rowland, 2006). The method assumes that neutral molecules only interact with neutral phospholipids, and only ionized bases interact with APs, an assumption questioned previously (Korzekwa and Nagar, 2017b). The major acidic phospholipid is phosphatidylserine and the major neutral phospholipid is phosphatidylcholine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the plausibility of species-specific differences in binding to acidic phospholipids has not been investigated for Compound 2, this example highlights the impact and thus the requirement of measuring BPR for compounds with basic centres to inform PBPK models. A recent publication, although critiquing some assumptions behind PBPK models, stated that K p s for bases are well predicted, possibly because of the use of BPR to calculate acidic phospholipid binding constants [79].…”
Section: Power Of Blood/plasma Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%