2005
DOI: 10.1080/03637750500111815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

62
1,497
11
16

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,175 publications
(1,586 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
62
1,497
11
16
Order By: Relevance
“…[6,8,9,17,19,[21][22][23]25]. This research indicates that when language becomes more controlling, people are more prone to respond in 1 The original theory of psychological reactance [3] speaks of perceived freedom instead of perceived autonomy.…”
Section: Psychological Reactancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6,8,9,17,19,[21][22][23]25]. This research indicates that when language becomes more controlling, people are more prone to respond in 1 The original theory of psychological reactance [3] speaks of perceived freedom instead of perceived autonomy.…”
Section: Psychological Reactancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1); (1) a perceived autonomy 1 (e.g., autonomy to choose coffee or tea at a conference), (2) a threat 2 to that perceived autonomy (e.g., a waitress persuading you to drink coffee), (3) the experience of psychological reactance (i.e., as indicated by feelings of anger and negative cognitions), and (4) a desire to restore the threatened autonomy (e.g., asking for tea instead of coffee). The restoration of autonomy can occur directly, by doing the forbidden act; or indirectly by an increase of attractiveness or liking for the eliminated option [5], by denying the existence of the threat to autonomy, by exercising a similar autonomy to gain a feeling of control, or by derogating the source, described in [8].…”
Section: Psychological Reactancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social control can lead to negative emotions (e.g., anger, hostility) if the target feels that his or her freedom is being constrained (Dillard and Shen 2005;Rook 1990) or that the would-be influencer is not truly concerned about the target person's health. In contrast, social control can lead to positive emotions (e.g., happiness) if the target person feels that the individual attempting to influence them is genuinely concerned about his or her health or if the social control is embedded in a high-quality relationship (Lewis and Butterfield 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, social control can lead to positive emotions (e.g., happiness) if the target person feels that the individual attempting to influence them is genuinely concerned about his or her health or if the social control is embedded in a high-quality relationship (Lewis and Butterfield 2005). Tucker and Anders (2001) proposed that negative emotions in response to social control lead to reactance, or the motivation to reject or actively resist social control, and behavioral resistance (Brehm and Brehm 1981;Dillard and Shen 2005). Much of this research has examined influence attempts from spouses and romantic partners, rather than from the parents of adolescents transitioning into adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability was excellent (a = .925, M = 4.07, SD = 1.16). The perceived threat measure, derived from Dillard and Shen's (2005) scale of perceived threat, used 7-point Likert-type scale items (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Items consisted of the message threatened my freedom to choose, the message tried to manipulate me, the message tried to make a decision for me, and the message tried to pressure me.…”
Section: Message Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%