1986
DOI: 10.1086/163805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of the dwarf carbon star G77-61

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first such case was G77-61 with a classical carbon star spectrum but a high proper motion suggesting a main sequence luminosity. It is a spectroscopic binary and mass transfer is a likely explanation for it (Dearborn et al, 1986). Additional examples have now been found Green et al, 1992;Warren et al, 1993).…”
Section: Barium and Related Starsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The first such case was G77-61 with a classical carbon star spectrum but a high proper motion suggesting a main sequence luminosity. It is a spectroscopic binary and mass transfer is a likely explanation for it (Dearborn et al, 1986). Additional examples have now been found Green et al, 1992;Warren et al, 1993).…”
Section: Barium and Related Starsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The orbital similarity between these two groups is a further indication that their different names stem from historical reasons, but there is no physical difference between them, apart from the fact that CH systems always involve giant primaries, whereas CEMP systems comprise dwarf primaries as well (see the d/g column in Table 4). Long-standing historical equivalents of the dwarf CEMP-s stars are the subgiant CH stars (Luck & Bond 1991) and the formerly known dwarf carbon stars, such as G77-61 (Dearborn et al 1986; see Table 9.5 of Jorissen 2004 for a review) or the "carbon dwarf wearing a necklace", the central star of the planetary nebula G054.2 -03.4 (Corradi et al 2011;Miszalski et al 2013). The latter has not been listed explicitly in Table 4 because it is not formally known as a CH or CEMP star.…”
Section: Cemp-s Vs Ch Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other dwarf, G77-61, with the second shortest period, deserves comment because of the rather weak carbon enrichment of ÂœC/ H $ À1:4 (Plez & Cohen 2005). It has the mass $0.3 M (Dearborn et al 1986) and is likely to be wholly convective. In addition, the cross section of the star for the accretion is a factor of $7 smaller than that of a red giant CEMP star (see eq.…”
Section: Periodycarbon Enhancement Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%