2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-015-3149-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Nb-Ge Binary System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested that the difference is related to the pseudo potentials used. In this study we are basing the phase diagram on our calculations [8], which appear to be confirmed by the experimental results in the current work (e.g. XRD analysis reported in section 4.0).…”
Section: Ge-nb Systemsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is suggested that the difference is related to the pseudo potentials used. In this study we are basing the phase diagram on our calculations [8], which appear to be confirmed by the experimental results in the current work (e.g. XRD analysis reported in section 4.0).…”
Section: Ge-nb Systemsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When plotting the diagram using the published dataset a small inadvertent miscibility gap was seen at the Nb 3 Ge-liquid phase boundary (Figure 2a In the previously reported literature [11][12][13][14] there is a conflict over the prototype structure of the Nb 5 Ge 3 phase, whether it has the Cr 5 B 3 or W 5 Si 3 prototype. First principles calculations reported in our previous study using CASTEP [8] indicate that the W 5 Si 3 prototype is more stable than the Cr 5 B 3 structure, over the whole temperature range (at 0 K by -0.1 kJ/mol atom). However, Colinet et al [15] recently performed similar calculations using VASP but instead found that the Cr 5 B 3 prototype was more stable than the W 5 Si 3 prototype (by -0.3 kJ/mol at 0 K).…”
Section: Ge-nb Systemmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations