2021
DOI: 10.1080/21624887.2021.1904191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the necessity of critical race feminism for women, peace and security

Marsha Henry

Abstract: This intervention is concerned with whiteness as central to the operation of women/gender, peace and security in academic settings. That is, G/WPS in universities is founded on white authority and expertise and consistently orients itself from the privileged viewpoint of the global north. Through two brief examples, I show how the generation of research on G/WPS consistently centres and relies on white starting points, in order to convey the 'necessity' of G/WPS in the university and to government funders. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Racial silence extends outside academic research and into organizations that report on the state of peace. While there is a commitment in some reports to include diversity, inclusion, and social justice measures, these reports on peace in the United States do not include systemic racism or racism measures (Azarmandi, 2018; Bonilla-Silva, 2010; Henry, 2021). The 2019 Institute for Economics and Peace report on positive peace includes some relevant measures, such as the acceptance of rights of others, equitable distribution of resources, good relations with neighbors, and high levels of social capital.…”
Section: Peace Studies Racial Silence and Racial Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Racial silence extends outside academic research and into organizations that report on the state of peace. While there is a commitment in some reports to include diversity, inclusion, and social justice measures, these reports on peace in the United States do not include systemic racism or racism measures (Azarmandi, 2018; Bonilla-Silva, 2010; Henry, 2021). The 2019 Institute for Economics and Peace report on positive peace includes some relevant measures, such as the acceptance of rights of others, equitable distribution of resources, good relations with neighbors, and high levels of social capital.…”
Section: Peace Studies Racial Silence and Racial Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of work paying careful attention to the raced politics of security (Eriksson Baaz and Verweijen, 2018;Henry, 2021;Richter-Montpetit, 2019, 2020;Security Dialogue, 2020), these drawing on an extensive literature within and beyond IR (Anievas et al, 2015;Henderson, 2013;Rutazibwa, 2020;Sabaratnam, 2020). This work has demonstrated how the categories on which both security policy and theory rely -threat, danger, vulnerability, death, norm and exception, the human -are rooted in and generative of colonial, racist, and white supremacist politics.…”
Section: Conclusion: Security Through Strugglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To my knowledge, at the time of writing, there have yet to be discourse analyses published that focus on this NAP and so the research has the potential to make a novel contribution to the already well-established literature on WPS policy analysis, including the existing literature on discursive NAP analyses (refer to Hudson 2017; Madsen and Hudson 2020). Existing discourse analyses of NAPs (see, e.g., Drummond and Rebelo 2020; Hudson 2017; Madsen and Hudson 2020) have surfaced the importance of studying the language of peacebuilding policy documents as a means not only to understand the local gendered conditions from which these texts emanate, but also as a critical site for the potential rupturing of gendered power relations to work towards more holistic and enduring experiences of peace and equality for all citizens, including and especially those who identify outside of traditional gender binaries and whose gender and sexual identities intersect with other axes of oppression (Haastrup and Hagen 2021;Henry 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%