2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-016-2111-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Newtonian limit of metric f(R) gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, such oscillations of the Newtonian potential have been found in a variety of other formulations aiming to amend Einstein gravity. These include f (R)-gravity [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109], string induced, ghost free, non-local gravity [110,111] and other non-local formulations [112]. On the other hand, in the low energy limit for which only the three spatial dimensions are visible, the oscillations disappear as expected in similar quantum gravity contexts [113,114].…”
Section: Revised Gup In Higher Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, such oscillations of the Newtonian potential have been found in a variety of other formulations aiming to amend Einstein gravity. These include f (R)-gravity [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109], string induced, ghost free, non-local gravity [110,111] and other non-local formulations [112]. On the other hand, in the low energy limit for which only the three spatial dimensions are visible, the oscillations disappear as expected in similar quantum gravity contexts [113,114].…”
Section: Revised Gup In Higher Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…form V ef f = −G M r (1 + α cos(mr + θ)) (1.4) where θ is an arbitrary parameter. Such a potential clearly has no Newtonian limit and could be ruled out immediately on this basis [20,31]. However, since the extra force component averages out to zero, for sub-millimeter wavelength oscillations and α = O(1) such an oscillating correction could remain undetectable by current experiments and astrophysical observations due to finite accuracy in length and force measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such parametrizations are motivated by viable extensions of General Relativity and include Yukawa interactions leading to an effective gravitational potential V ef f = −G M r (1 + αe −mr ) (1.1) * leandros@uoi.gr and a power-law ansatz of the form [13] V ef f = −G M r (1 + β k ( 1 mr ) k−1 ) (1.2) arising for example in the context of some brane world models [14][15][16][17]. The Yukawa interaction parametrization (1.1) is motivated by the weak gravitational field limit solution of a point mass in a wide range of extensions of GR including f (R) theories [18][19][20] massive Brans-Dicke (BD) [21][22][23] and scalar tensor theories, compactified extra dimension models [24][25][26][27][28][29] etc. In each of these models the mass scale m has a different physical origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Yukawa parametrization is the most commonly used parametrization for testing for deviations from Newton's law on sub-mm scales. It is generic and well motivated theoretically as it is a natural prediction in the context of a wide range of modified gravity theories including Brans-Dicke [51][52][53], scalar-tensor [54][55][56][57] and f (R) theories [58][59][60]. It is also a natural prediction of theories involving compactified extra dimensions such as Kaluza-Klein theories [61].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%