2019
DOI: 10.3233/tad-190226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the non-disabled perceptions of four common mobility devices in Norway: A comparative study based on semantic differentials

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mobility devices such as walkers and wheelchairs are often associated with certain stigma. Such devices must be designed with the goal of reducing stigma to decrease the abandonmentrate. Yet there is little empirical evidence on how mobility devices are perceived. OBJECTIVE: This study set out to explore how (N = 40) non-disabled individuals perceived four common mobility devices including a traditional walker, rollator, manual wheelchair and a powered wheelchair. METHODS: A questionnaire based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to assistive technology and training in how to use assistive technology is not enough. Users often abandon assistive technologies because they perceive a social stigma associated with a device that usually relate to disability [18][19][20]. Therefore, to use mainstream devices such as smartphones as assistive technologies, it is believed to reduce or eliminate such perceived stigma [21] as users want to blend in and be like everybody else.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to assistive technology and training in how to use assistive technology is not enough. Users often abandon assistive technologies because they perceive a social stigma associated with a device that usually relate to disability [18][19][20]. Therefore, to use mainstream devices such as smartphones as assistive technologies, it is believed to reduce or eliminate such perceived stigma [21] as users want to blend in and be like everybody else.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefits of traditional devices are widely documented in the literature, their adoption and consistent use amongst visually impaired individuals is impeded by various factors such as discomfort or difficulty to use and carry, cost, social stigma, lack of training support and skills in caregivers, and finally lack of availability or supplies. 10,37,[40][41][42] The World Health Organization reiterates lack of affordability as one of the key reasons for not acquiring assistive products in LMIC. 43 The Closed-Circuit Tele Vision or electronic video magnifiers are not affordable, especially due to associated high costs, whereas the cost of a smartphone is relatively lower in comparison.…”
Section: Advantages and Access To Assistive Technology For Visual Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a design perspective, it is interesting to explore products' aesthetical and symbolic functions, as it may play a role in technology acceptance. A recent study explore these aspects from the perspective of non users' perceptions about mobility devices [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%