2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00834-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Non-uniqueness of Solutions to the Perfect Phylogeny Mixture Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of a tumor is typically described by a phylogenetic tree, or phylogeny, whose leaves represent the cells observed at the present time and whose internal nodes represent ancestral cells. Tumor phylogenies are challenging to reconstruct using DNA sequencing data from bulk tumor samples, since this data contains mixtures of mutations from thousandsmillions of heterogeneous cells in the sample [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . Recently, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) of tumors has become more common, and new technologies such as those from 10X Genomics 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of a tumor is typically described by a phylogenetic tree, or phylogeny, whose leaves represent the cells observed at the present time and whose internal nodes represent ancestral cells. Tumor phylogenies are challenging to reconstruct using DNA sequencing data from bulk tumor samples, since this data contains mixtures of mutations from thousandsmillions of heterogeneous cells in the sample [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . Recently, single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) of tumors has become more common, and new technologies such as those from 10X Genomics 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, more than one phylogenetic tree can be inferred from the same sequencing data (Jamal-Hanjani et al, 2017;Pradhan and El-Kebir, 2018). If the data can be described by multiple trees, the user should be able to observe the spatial consistency between visualizations from different trees.…”
Section: Analysis Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has shown that many different hypothesized mutation trees can be consistent with data from a single patient [21,22]. Clustering these trees is a compelling use case for tumor evolution distance measures as it has the potential to reveal structure in the space of compatible trees of a single dataset.…”
Section: Clustering Clonal Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the GraPhyC method [20] uses a distance measure to create a consensus tumor history from several input histories. Lastly, there have been growing questions about the structure of the space of possible evolutionary histories consistent with the underlying sequence data [21][22][23] and how tumor evolutionary histories across patients can be used to identify patterns of tumor evolution [24,25]. Further analysis of these questions would be aided by distance measures tuned to the intricacies of tumor evolution histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%