Scour and Erosion 2014
DOI: 10.1201/b17703-39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the numerical modelling of the Hole Erosion Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This capability is especially important for two-phase flow problems in which the time scales of the various phases can be significantly different. More specifically, the flow time scale for our case, and for most geophysical flow applications, is significantly smaller than the time scale of bed morphodynamics [73]. Dimensional analysis of the governing equations for flow and morphodynamics show that the erosion kinetics are significantly slower than the flow kinetics and that the time scale of bed change is approximately two orders of magnitude greater than that of the flow field [73].…”
Section: Variable Time-stepping Techniquementioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This capability is especially important for two-phase flow problems in which the time scales of the various phases can be significantly different. More specifically, the flow time scale for our case, and for most geophysical flow applications, is significantly smaller than the time scale of bed morphodynamics [73]. Dimensional analysis of the governing equations for flow and morphodynamics show that the erosion kinetics are significantly slower than the flow kinetics and that the time scale of bed change is approximately two orders of magnitude greater than that of the flow field [73].…”
Section: Variable Time-stepping Techniquementioning
confidence: 82%
“…More specifically, the flow time scale for our case, and for most geophysical flow applications, is significantly smaller than the time scale of bed morphodynamics [73]. Dimensional analysis of the governing equations for flow and morphodynamics show that the erosion kinetics are significantly slower than the flow kinetics and that the time scale of bed change is approximately two orders of magnitude greater than that of the flow field [73]. From a practical point of view, it is also important to have the capability of utilizing two different time steps for the flow and bed-change calculations as the mobile bed of a natural waterway requires integration over a very long physical time to reach quasi-equilibrium.…”
Section: Variable Time-stepping Techniquementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the loose-coupling FSI approach for flow-bed interactions with the assumption that the bed surface geometry, rate of change of the bed surface, and concentration fields of flow and suspended sediment are available at time step 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 , we use the following algorithm to solve for the flow field and bed morphodynamics at time step Finally, a key aspect of the simulations is that we employ different time steps to match the hydrodynamic and morphodynamic modules of the code with respect to time. Given that, for most applications in geophysical flows, the characteristic time scale of the morphodynamics is an order of magnitude larger than that of the hydrodynamics (Mercier et al, 2012), different time steps for the flow and morphodynamics alleviate the high computational costs of the coupled simulations. More specifically, for river simulations, the coupled system of flow and morphodynamics should be run long enough to obtain the dynamic equilibrium bed morphology covering the time scale of the morphodynamic evolution.…”
Section: Coupling Of Hydrodynamics and Morphodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can clearly identify two types of numerical modeling frameworks. In the first type, numerical models apply computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software for computing the fluid motion only above the bed [1,[25][26][27]. The second modeling framework is based on two-phase approaches, in which the motion equations solve both solid and fluid phases [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%