2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0012217317000968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Objective Meaningful Life Argument: A Response to Kirk Lougheed

Abstract: Kirk Lougheed has argued that the Objective Meaningful Life Argument establishes a type of anti-theism, the view that a theistic God’s existence would make things worse and thus it’s rational to prefer that God not exist. The objective version of this argument is said to be an improvement over my subjective version of the Meaningful Life Argument. I argue that Lougheed’s version fares no better than the subjective version.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-theism, the view that God's existence would make things worse, has received significant attention in the literature. So far, the Meaningful Life Argument for anti-theism has been the most discussed (e.g., Kahane, 2011;Lougheed, 2017Lougheed, , 2020Penner, 2015Penner, , 2018. This argument says, roughly, that certain individuals' life pursuits are so inextricably connected to their not being a God that were God to exist their lives would lose meaning or be significantly less meaningful than they would be otherwise.…”
Section: Anti-theismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti-theism, the view that God's existence would make things worse, has received significant attention in the literature. So far, the Meaningful Life Argument for anti-theism has been the most discussed (e.g., Kahane, 2011;Lougheed, 2017Lougheed, , 2020Penner, 2015Penner, , 2018. This argument says, roughly, that certain individuals' life pursuits are so inextricably connected to their not being a God that were God to exist their lives would lose meaning or be significantly less meaningful than they would be otherwise.…”
Section: Anti-theismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…147 Kahane (2011) first introduced an argument along these lines, to which he appears highly sympathetic. For discussion, see Kraay and Dragos (2013); Penner (2015); Lougheed (2017); Penner (2018); and Lougheed (2020b, chapter 2). 148 Lougheed (2020b, chapter 3) discusses the fictional case of Sally, who requires privacy for her life to be meaningful.…”
Section: Loss Of Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapter 2 explains the Meaningful Life Argument, which is first gestured at by Kahane (2011), and subsequently developed, though ultimately rejected, by Myron A. Penner (2015Penner ( , 2018. This argument aims to support the position that, for certain individuals, the world would be better if God didn't exist since if God did exist their lives would be meaningless.…”
Section: Chapter Summariesmentioning
confidence: 99%